Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.

Innovation Space

FREE STUDENT SOFTWARE

Deactivating the temperature field to simulate the cooling process

- May 7, 2023 at 11:21 am
  
  Colin Zhang
  Subscriber
  
  I have one bar with two ends. A one-step steady-thermal analysis was performed first to get the temperature field of the bar in which the temperature changes from one end of the bar to another end of the bar. Next the temperature field was imported into the static structural analysis which has multiple steps of loading and unloading. For example, it has 4 steps. The first step is to apply the transverse pressure and temperature field obtained above to simulate the loading and heating process. The second step is to unload the transverse pressure and cool the bar to room temperature. The third step is the same as the first step while the fourth step is the same as the second step. How can I load and unload the tempearture field in Workbench Mechanical? Deactivating the temperature field in the 2nd step and 4th step directly in the Graph?
- May 7, 2023 at 12:04 pm
  
  Ashish Khemka
  Forum Moderator
  
  Hi Colin,
  You can import the data for 4 steps and then deactivate the same for 2nd and 4th steps. You can view the same in the graph:
  
  Regards,
  Ashish Khemka
- May 8, 2023 at 7:24 am
  
  Colin Zhang
  Subscriber
  
  Hello Ashish,
  Thank you very much for your reply.
  In fact, my Static Analysis has 7 steps. The 1st step is bolt-pretension. The 2nd, 4th and 6th steps are pressure loading and heating while the 3rd, 5th and 7th steps are unloading and cooling. See Figure 1 for pressure loading and unloading. The way of how I imported the temperature is shown in Figure 2 while your way is shown in Figure 3. The Data View, Graph, and Tabular Data show the big difference. The "Auto Time Stepping" is ON. The Initial Substeps, Minimum Substeps and Maximum Substeps are 10, 5, and 100, respectively. So the Time(s) in Tabular Data is shown as 1.0001, etc.
- May 8, 2023 at 7:34 am
  
  Colin Zhang
  Subscriber
  
  Hello Ashish,
  
  My model involves material plasticity and contact pairs. It failed at the 4th step.
  
  #The 2nd step involves many warnings like below. Any actions needed?
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  *** WARNING *** CP = 1035.703 TIME= 12:46:21
  The current Level of Difficulty on the PCGOPT command may be inefficient for this model due to coupling equation(s) and/or constraint equation(s) present. If this solution appears to be inefficient, you may find that switching to a Level of Difficulty equal to 1 [PCGOPT,1] more efficient for this model.
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  #The 3rd step involve warnings, notes, and errors like below. Any actions needed ?
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  *** WARNING *** CP = 38533.234 TIME= 23:15:25
  The current Level of Difficulty on the PCGOPT command may be inefficient for this model due to coupling equation(s) and/or constraint equation(s) present. If this solution appears to be inefficient, you may find that switching to a Level of Difficulty equal to 1 [PCGOPT,1] more efficient for this model.
  
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.5708E+05 CRITERION= 2632.
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 28.08 CRITERION= 0.5102E-04
  
  *** NOTE *** CP = 38790.953 TIME= 23:19:43
  The preconditioned conjugate gradient solver failed to converge, and therefore no solution was obtained. The equation solver is now being automatically switched to the sparse solver (EQSLV,SPARSE) to allow this analysis to continue.
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.4709 CRITERION= 0.1124
  EQUIL ITER 1 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= -0.4709
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.1518 CRITERION= 0.1147
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 0.3224 SCALED MAX DOF INC = -0.1518
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.3857E+05 CRITERION= 171.9
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 23.37 CRITERION= 248.1 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 2 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= 0.7681E-01
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.7563E-01 CRITERION= 0.1171 <<< CONVERGED
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 0.9847 SCALED MAX DOF INC = 0.7563E-01
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 1965. CRITERION= 175.3
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 2.255 CRITERION= 253.0 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 3 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= 0.9337E-02
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.9337E-02 CRITERION= 0.1194 <<< CONVERGED
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 1.000 SCALED MAX DOF INC = 0.9337E-02
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 401.8 CRITERION= 179.3
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.5137E-01 CRITERION= 258.7 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 4 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= 0.6605E-02
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.6605E-02 CRITERION= 0.1219 <<< CONVERGED
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 1.000 SCALED MAX DOF INC = 0.6605E-02
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 198.5 CRITERION= 183.0
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.5709E-01 CRITERION= 264.1 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 5 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= -0.6990E-02
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.6990E-02 CRITERION= 0.1244 <<< CONVERGED
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 1.000 SCALED MAX DOF INC = -0.6990E-02
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 210.0 CRITERION= 187.0
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.3405E-01 CRITERION= 270.0 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 6 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= -0.7422E-02
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.7422E-02 CRITERION= 0.1269 <<< CONVERGED
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 1.000 SCALED MAX DOF INC = -0.7422E-02
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 142.2 CRITERION= 191.0 <<< CONVERGED
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.1315E-01 CRITERION= 275.6 <<< CONVERGED
  >>> SOLUTION CONVERGED AFTER EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 6
  *** LOAD STEP 3 SUBSTEP 4 COMPLETED. CUM ITER = 109
  *** TIME = 2.40000 TIME INC = 0.100000
  *** MAX PLASTIC STRAIN STEP = 0.1679E-02 CRITERION = 0.1500
  *** AUTO TIME STEP: NEXT TIME INC = 0.15000 INCREASED (FACTOR = 1.5000)
  
  *** NOTE *** CP = 43066.172 TIME= 00:30:59
  The equation solver is automatically reverting from the sparse solver back to the preconditioned conjugate gradient solver.
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  *** ERROR *** CP = 46802.359 TIME= 01:33:17
  Element 73021 (type = 2, SOLID187) (and maybe other elements) has become highly distorted. Excessive distortion of elements is usually a symptom indicating the need for corrective action elsewhere. Try incrementing the load more slowly (increase the number of substeps or decrease the time step size). You may need to improve your mesh to obtain elements with better aspect ratios. Also consider the behavior of materials, contact pairs, and/or constraint equations. Please rule out other root causes of this failure before attempting rezoning or nonlinear adaptive solutions. If this message appears in the first iteration of first substep, be sure to perform element shape checking.
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  *** NOTE *** CP = 201257.641 TIME= 20:30:35
  The incremental plastic strain 62.2106268% computed in this iteration is larger than the criterion of 15% leading to bisection. You may try incrementing the load more slowly by increasing the number of substeps or use the CUTCONTROL command to re-specify this criterion.
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  #The solution stopped at load step 4, substep 16 with error as shown below. How can I correct the errors?
  
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  >>> SOLUTION CONVERGED AFTER EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 7
  *** LOAD STEP 4 SUBSTEP 15 COMPLETED. CUM ITER = 416
  *** TIME = 3.41150 TIME INC = 0.100000E-01
  *** MAX PLASTIC STRAIN STEP = 0.3756 CRITERION = 0.1500
  *** AUTO STEP TIME: NEXT TIME INC = 0.10000E-01 UNCHANGED
  
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 2963. CRITERION= 277.2
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.4922 CRITERION= 0.5102E-04
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.5154E-01 CRITERION= 0.1124 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 1 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= -0.5154E-01
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.2969E-01 CRITERION= 0.1147 <<< CONVERGED
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 0.5760 SCALED MAX DOF INC = -0.2969E-01
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 1259. CRITERION= 136.2
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.2087 CRITERION= 196.5 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 2 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= 0.2179
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.1155E-01 CRITERION= 0.1171 <<< CONVERGED
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 0.5303E-01 SCALED MAX DOF INC = 0.1155E-01
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 1190. CRITERION= 138.9
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.1977 CRITERION= 200.5 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 3 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= 0.1992
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.1992 CRITERION= 0.1194
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 1.000 SCALED MAX DOF INC = 0.1992
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 7999. CRITERION= 141.7
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.8859E-02 CRITERION= 204.6 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 4 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= -0.3821E-01
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.3821E-01 CRITERION= 0.1219 <<< CONVERGED
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 1.000 SCALED MAX DOF INC = -0.3821E-01
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 4421. CRITERION= 144.7
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.9883E-02 CRITERION= 208.8 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 5 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= -0.1681
  DISP CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.6666E-01 CRITERION= 0.1244 <<< CONVERGED
  LINE SEARCH PARAMETER = 0.3966 SCALED MAX DOF INC = -0.6666E-01
  FORCE CONVERGENCE VALUE = 3094. CRITERION= 147.6
  MOMENT CONVERGENCE VALUE = 0.6133E-02 CRITERION= 213.1 <<< CONVERGED
  EQUIL ITER 6 COMPLETED. NEW TRIANG MATRIX. MAX DOF INC= -0.3314
  
  *** ERROR *** CP = 248350.578 TIME= 09:35:44
  Element 1293421 (type = 5, SOLID187) (and maybe other elements) has become highly distorted. Excessive distortion of elements is usually a symptom indicating the need for corrective action elsewhere. Try incrementing the load more slowly (increase the number of substeps or decrease the time step size). You may need to improve your mesh to obtain elements with better aspect ratios. Also consider the behavior of materials, contact pairs, and/or constraint equations. Please rule out other root causes of this failure before attempting rezoning or nonlinear adaptive solutions. If this message appears in the first iteration of first substep, be sure to perform element shape checking.
  
  *** WARNING *** CP = 248350.781 TIME= 09:35:45
  The unconverged solution (identified as time 4 substep 999999) is output for analysis debug purposes. Results should not be used for any other purpose.
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Although the solution has many element distortions, they might not be the root cause. May increasing the Maximum substeps from 100 to 200 help solve the errors?
  
  Thank you,
  Colin
- May 8, 2023 at 10:53 am
  
  Ashish Khemka
  Forum Moderator
  
  Hi Colin,
  
  For the loads - it looks like the temperature is ramped for each active step. For element distortion please see if the following link is of help:
  Dealing with Convergence Issues - Element Distortion Error - FEA Tips
  
  Thanks and Regards,
  Ashish Khemka

Viewing 4 reply threads

The topic ‘Deactivating the temperature field to simulate the cooling process’ is closed to new replies.

[bingo_chatbox]