-
-
August 25, 2022 at 9:16 am
tumulpurwar
SubscriberI would like to know, whether in new Ansys versions, adapt y+ criteria is valid for all types of cells.
As with old versiosn of Ansys Fluent, adapt y+ only valid for Tetrahedral cells.
Also if there is any better substitute in place of adapt y+ Adaption in new versions?
-
August 25, 2022 at 1:22 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorI don't remember that ever being a limitation, https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/account/Secured?returnurl=/Views/Secured/corp/v222/en/flu_ug/flu_ug_chp_adapt.html The only issue I remember was trying anisotropic adaption on anything that wasn't a hex or prism cell.
You can still create registers on y+, whether there is a better option will depend on why you think you shouldn't be looking solely at y+
-
August 25, 2022 at 1:27 pm
tumulpurwar
SubscriberI have gone through guide, but they didn't talk about Y+ adaption, other adaption they talked about.
I already tried with register,
But as I click adapt, it tells that polyhedral meshes can't be adapted.
Why??
Tetrahedral it's accepting.
-
August 26, 2022 at 6:10 am
tumulpurwar
SubscriberHi ROB
Is Adapted Tetrahedral can be converted in to polyhedral cells in Fluent?
-
August 26, 2022 at 7:05 am
-
August 26, 2022 at 7:09 am
-
August 26, 2022 at 7:35 am
-
August 26, 2022 at 7:38 am
tumulpurwar
SubscriberFor gradient based adaption for old versions, dynamic adaption is possible but only for tet.
Polyhedral dynamic adaption only coming from 2021 update
-
August 26, 2022 at 10:25 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorWhich version of Fluent are you using? Poly adaption requires PUMA, which has been available for a while and is the default in the last few releases.
-
August 26, 2022 at 10:32 am
-
August 26, 2022 at 10:41 am
-
August 26, 2022 at 10:50 am
tumulpurwar
Subscriberits 2019 R3..but i want know, i ran for a while my simulation, than tried to adapt y*, but why it gives answer that it cant adapt..?
PUMA I dont need for now, for my application, solution adaptive mesh refinement can work too
-
August 26, 2022 at 10:55 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorYou can adapt the boundary layer, but there are rules for anisotropic adaption. Please post exactly what panels you're using.
-
August 26, 2022 at 11:16 am
tumulpurwar
SubscriberHi Rob
This is hull around which i have fine prism layer and currenntly after running some itaeration , my y is shown in photo,i want make it betwenn 30 and 300 , and due to this reason i want use y adaption, i am not sure, why you dont recommend y* adaption?
Anisotropic probably is expensive in terms of memory.and even if i use anoisotropic my y* will never come in range what i want
-
August 26, 2022 at 11:44 am
-
August 26, 2022 at 1:06 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorDynamic adaption means Fluent will refine and coarse automatically as the crition are met. It's commonly used for free surface modelling where the free surface moves and we don't want to refine regions that we don't have to.
If you need to refine near the wall you'll need to use anisotropic on the boundary layer. This has limitations (you must adapt the whole cell layer, and that layer must terminate at an external boundary or be "looped").
I have not recommended either y+ or y*, I am trying to explain adaption.
-
August 26, 2022 at 1:12 pm
tumulpurwar
SubscriberThnaks Rob, i understood what you said, but this is what i am asking, why i cant use y* adaption, if it is in fluent?
and why its not adapting prism layer in my case, when my mesh is only polyhedral ,made in fluent meshing?
Thanks
-
August 26, 2022 at 1:13 pm
tumulpurwar
SubscriberIt means PUMA and Dynamic adaption in polyhedral is different things?
-
August 26, 2022 at 1:15 pm
tumulpurwar
SubscriberIn my case i need to refine either prism layer or refine velocity gradient near hull wall, as well as need to refine with help of criteria pressure waves(sea waves hitting or resisting hull movement forward)
-
August 26, 2022 at 1:21 pm
tumulpurwar
SubscriberAlso i dont want to refine further boundary layer, as you can see from my earlier photo of y* plot, i want to coarse and fine boundary layer so that in can come under 30 to 300, as i am using wall function, thats why i think anisotropic will not help here, what you say?
-
August 26, 2022 at 1:32 pm
-
August 26, 2022 at 1:52 pm
tumulpurwar
SubscriberSo i guess conclusion is
y* adaption for 2019 R3 license with polyhedral cells doesnot work for PRISM LAYERS
Anisotropic can work
For tetrahedral ,y* adapt can work
-
August 26, 2022 at 2:07 pm
-
August 26, 2022 at 2:40 pm
tumulpurwar
SubscriberHi Rob
I went through guide book, understood all issues now, thanks
-
- The topic ‘Adapt y+ adaption’ is closed to new replies.
- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
-
3892
-
1414
-
1241
-
1118
-
1015
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.