-
-
October 27, 2021 at 12:41 pmGuojunSubscriber
Hello,
I am simulating a case using Fluent 2021R1 on my office computer (Windows system) and HPC(Linux system). However, when the same case was simulated on both system with turbulence model employed, the simulation results are very different. The below picture is the contours of liquid fraction on a surface.
October 27, 2021 at 1:37 pmRobForum ModeratorCan you check convergence and whether both are single/double precision. What is the mesh like at the interface as you're not getting liquid in the stationary zone either.
October 27, 2021 at 2:08 pmOctober 28, 2021 at 11:20 amRobForum ModeratorThat should give the same result. Can you post contours of velocity etc to see what else is going on? Has anyone else checked your model set up, and are you using any UDF code?
Viewing 3 reply threads- The topic ‘The simulation results obtained by Windows and Linux are different’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussions- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Script error Code: 800a000d
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- error udf
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
Top Contributors-
1241
-
543
-
523
-
225
-
209
Top Rated Tags© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-
The Ansys Learning Forum is a public forum. You are prohibited from providing (i) information that is confidential to You, your employer, or any third party, (ii) Personal Data or individually identifiable health information, (iii) any information that is U.S. Government Classified, Controlled Unclassified Information, International Traffic in Arms Regulators (ITAR) or Export Administration Regulators (EAR) controlled or otherwise have been determined by the United States Government or by a foreign government to require protection against unauthorized disclosure for reasons of national security, or (iv) topics or information restricted by the People's Republic of China data protection and privacy laws.