Array ( [topic_list] => Array ( [status] => 1 [topics] => Array ( [1] => Array ( [topic_id] => 427850 [topic_title] => SpaceClaim Cross Section View in Drawing Sheet not hiding geometry correctly [topic_content] => <p>I'm seeing some strange behaviour regarding Section views in a SpaceClaim Drawing sheet.</p><p>A Section view is not hiding the parts of the geometry above the section plane. See 1st screenshot.</p><p>If I rotate the view slightly, it's clearer (2nd screenshot). The part of the model shown by the red arrow should not be visible.</p><p>I can't see any option that I need to set to fix this; and it isn't behaviour that SC used to exhibit.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p>Any ideas?</p> [topic_link] => https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/spaceclaim-cross-section-view-in-drawing-sheet-not-hiding-geometry-correctly/ [topic_status] => publish [topic_published_date] => April 3, 2025 [author] => Jeremy Morgan [like_count] => 0 [reply_count] => 0 [view_count] => 10 ) [2] => Array ( [topic_id] => 427536 [topic_title] => How to logout when logged in in LicensingSettings.exe [topic_content] => <p>When youre logged in with the wrong account in the LicensingSettings.exe of Spaceclaim.</p><p>Is it possible to logout? Now its locked on the account you first filled in but if you used the wrong account at first you cant go back.</p><p>For now deinstalling en deleting all files looks for me a little bit overkill?</p><p></p><p> </p> [topic_link] => https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/how-to-logout-when-logged-in-in-licensingsettingsexe/ [topic_status] => publish [topic_published_date] => April 1, 2025 [author] => benjamin@aesc.nl [like_count] => 0 [reply_count] => 2 [view_count] => 20 ) [3] => Array ( [topic_id] => 427298 [topic_title] => tutorial 1 [topic_content] => <p>....</p> [topic_link] => https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/tutorial-1/ [topic_status] => publish [topic_published_date] => March 30, 2025 [author] => manjot2359@gmail.com [like_count] => 0 [reply_count] => 1 [view_count] => 40 ) [4] => Array ( [topic_id] => 427209 [topic_title] => Missing Sheet Metal Blend option SpaceClaim 2025R1 [topic_content] => <p>Hello,</p><p>Was trying to use the Blend Function in 2025 R1, but i noticed the sheet metal blend function missing from the option panel. Could this be readded? Its a pretty important function for every company who are processing sheet metal:</p><p>2024.2                                                                                                                      2025.1</p><p>                 </p> [topic_link] => https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/missing-sheet-metal-blend-option-spaceclaim-2025r1/ [topic_status] => publish [topic_published_date] => March 28, 2025 [author] => paul pladet [like_count] => 0 [reply_count] => 1 [view_count] => 44 ) [5] => Array ( [topic_id] => 427125 [topic_title] => Looking for Geometry File from ANSYS Wing Structural Analysis Video [topic_content] => <p>I'm trying to find the original geometry file used in an ANSYS tutorial video on the structural analysis of a ribbed wing. The link is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiTA2AiswEQ. The video starts with a pre-existing wing model, but no dimensions are given, and I need to recreate this for a class assignment.</p><p> </p> [topic_link] => https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/looking-for-geometry-file-from-ansys-wing-structural-analysis-video/ [topic_status] => publish [topic_published_date] => March 27, 2025 [author] => noler@arizona.edu [like_count] => 0 [reply_count] => 1 [view_count] => 39 ) [6] => Array ( [topic_id] => 426608 [topic_title] => SpaceClaim: wired operation outcome of split body [topic_content] => <p>Hi all,</p><p>I'm using SpaceClaim to perform pre-processing on an assembly created from SolidWorks. </p><p>It's a helical pipe. After I perform Split Body using surface as cutter,  weird new bodies has been created and a distorted surface has occurred unexpectedly.The pictures is as followed. </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>It's really puzzling. It's my first time to encounter the problem in SpaceClaim. Anyone has some suggestions? It's highly appreciated!!</p><p>Regards</p> [topic_link] => https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/spaceclaim-wired-operation-outcome-of-split-body/ [topic_status] => publish [topic_published_date] => March 24, 2025 [author] => Dato [like_count] => 1 [reply_count] => 1 [view_count] => 63 ) [7] => Array ( [topic_id] => 426506 [topic_title] => Surface Bodies excluded in Simulation/Outlet applied to multiple flow paths [topic_content] => <p><p>Hi, I'm trying to do a simulation but need to optimise it first. I am simulating an intake manifold, that was imported from Solidworks as a step file. I have volume extracted each outlet and inlet, and defined each outlet singularly in volume extract (but would need to do the inner and outer runners as pairs). But, when I define the inlet and outlet I get the error messages in the image below, and also get surface bodies will be excluded from simulation. **FYI this is in Ansys Discovery** In additiom, to it stating I need to add flow outlets, when I have already defined them. (For clarify there are alot of fillets etc that may be causing the issue, but unsure). </p></p> [topic_link] => https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/surface-bodies-excluded-in-simulationoutlet-applied-to-multiple-flow-paths/ [topic_status] => publish [topic_published_date] => March 22, 2025 [author] => tnkfrost09@hotmail.co.uk [like_count] => 0 [reply_count] => 1 [view_count] => 57 ) [8] => Array ( [topic_id] => 426393 [topic_title] => High Temperatures in Jacketed Tank [topic_content] => <p>Hello,</p><p>I am trying to simulate a jacketed mixing tank at cold temperatures. I am not sure as to why the solved temperatures of the inside tank appear to be so high. It is probably the way I have the simulation set up but I am not sure. Please help! Any ideas are much appreciated.</p><p>Also I am not familiar with what 'Convection (default)' exactly referring to.</p><p>Thanks!</p><p></p> [topic_link] => https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/high-temperatures-in-jacketed-tank/ [topic_status] => publish [topic_published_date] => March 20, 2025 [author] => tjhidalgo@olivet.edu [like_count] => 0 [reply_count] => 1 [view_count] => 69 ) [9] => Array ( [topic_id] => 426271 [topic_title] => Momentum Source Not Changing Flow Rate in a Closed-Loop Circuit [topic_content] => <p data-start="116" data-end="380"></p><p data-start="116" data-end="380">I am working on a <strong data-start="134" data-end="163">closed-loop fluid circuit in ANSYS Fluent and using a <strong data-start="192" data-end="211">momentum source to simulate a pump. However, despite applying the source term, the <strong data-start="279" data-end="310">flow rate remains unchanged, and I don’t see the expected increase in velocity within the loop.</p><p data-start="116" data-end="380"> </p><p data-start="382" data-end="416">Here’s what I have tried so far:</p><ul data-start="417" data-end="820"><li data-start="417" data-end="490">Applied the momentum source in the pump region in the image.<li data-start="491" data-end="588">Increased the source term magnitude significantly, but no noticeable effect on the flow rate.<li data-start="589" data-end="730">Checked boundary conditions—since this is a <strong data-start="635" data-end="657">closed-loop system, there are no inlets or outlets, just walls. <p data-start="822" data-end="994">I was expecting the momentum source to drive the flow, similar to how a pump would, but it doesn’t seem to be working. I have attached an image of my setup for reference.</p><p data-start="996" data-end="1103">Has anyone encountered this issue before? Are there additional settings or considerations I should check?</p><p data-start="1105" data-end="1149">Any insights would be greatly appreciated!</p><p data-start="1151" data-end="1169" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="">Thanks in advance.</p> [topic_link] => https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/momentum-source-not-changing-flow-rate-in-a-closed-loop-circuit/ [topic_status] => publish [topic_published_date] => March 19, 2025 [author] => mohammad.nabil@bexorg.com [like_count] => 0 [reply_count] => 20 [view_count] => 89 ) [10] => Array ( [topic_id] => 425850 [topic_title] => Discovery – set number of cores for Intel Alder Lake CPUs [topic_content] => <p>Dear team,</p><p>I'm using Discovery R2024R1 SP2. I'm doing some topology optimization runs and I see that apart form the GPU, Nvidia RTX A4500  16 GB laptop, the CPU, Intel Core i7-12850HX, gets loaded to around 100%. As the CPU is of an Alder Lake hybrid architecture with 8x P-("performance") and 8x E-("efficiency") cores,  I would like to reduce the number of cores used by Discovery just to the P-cores. I know the internal Intel Thread Director is doing its best, but I want to do some testing. </p><p>Is there an option of setting this? Under the Settings-> Physics -> Solver Settngs there is a pull down menu for number of cores, but this is most probaly influencing only the Refine Mechanical APDL solver.</p><p>Any suggestions?</p><p>12th Gen Intel® Core™ Processors Product Brief</p><p>Intel® Core™ i7-12850HX Processor</p><p>Best regards</p><p>Deyan</p><p> </p> [topic_link] => https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/discovery-set-number-of-cores-for-intel-alder-lake-cpus/ [topic_status] => publish [topic_published_date] => March 17, 2025 [author] => Deyan [like_count] => 0 [reply_count] => 2 [view_count] => 75 ) ) ) )