-
-
February 14, 2023 at 10:42 pmShakSubscriber
Hello,
I am currently working on a multiphase flow and would like to be sure what the differences are between using the DEM option that is handled by the Fluent software and the option to couple it with the ROCKY software.
I understand that the DEM option of Fluent can also simulate collisions between particles and with the wall, so why use the ROCKY option?Thank you in advance,
-
February 15, 2023 at 7:50 amAmine Ben Hadj AliAnsys Employee
Ansys Rocky is providing more DEM capabilities beyound the ones available in Ansys Fluent espcially if you want to consider non-spherical shapes.Â
Some background of the case you want investigate will help us to better guide you.
-
February 20, 2023 at 7:20 pmShakSubscriber
Thank you DrAmine, for your answer. My case is with spherical particles; I need to simulate the collisions between particle-particle and particle-wall.
Since this is a spherical particle, should the use of ansys fluent be enough? Or do you consider a better tool to couple with rocky? Why?
Â
Thank you.
-
February 21, 2023 at 6:39 amAmine Ben Hadj AliAnsys Employee
Ansys Fluent DEM will be enough. But if you are starting exploring DEM in general then I recommend Ansys Rocky.
Â
-
February 21, 2023 at 7:48 pmShakSubscriber
Thank you again!!
-
- The topic ‘Why ROCKY-DEM option?’ is closed to new replies.
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Script error Code: 800a000d
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- error udf
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
-
1241
-
543
-
523
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.