Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.
General Mechanical

General Mechanical

Topics related to Mechanical Enterprise, Motion, Additive Print and more.

Why is Adaptive Sizing not recommended in the mesh manual?

    • MickMack
      Subscriber

      Hi,

      I have applied adaptive sizing to a beam (BEAM188) and shell (SHELL181) model and the mesh seems to be ok, although i will be making some more refinements. I include a snippet below for context.

    • 1shan
      Ansys Employee
      ,nAdaptive sizing refines edges based on curvature and proximity but does not carry this refinement along the face to which the edge is attached. So you might have a mesh which captures the edge geometry accurately but with a poor face mesh. In such cases you could use hard face sizing controls which override the sizing functions for adaptive meshing along the face. you could do this by mesh>insert>sizing, specify the desired element size and scope to the the required face. In your case the mesh looks good but if you wish to refine it further you could either increase the resolution(which will refine globally) or add local sizing control.nRegards,nIshan.n
    • MickMack
      Subscriber
      Thank you,nYour response is excellent.nI thought the mesh looked okay but i was concerned about the warning in the mesh user guide. In the context of my model i think the adaptive sizing works well, most likely because there are no solids or curves.nnIs there any video tutorials/discussions you could recommend for best practice using the mesh sizing controls? i have been experimenting with these but i am not getting the mesh sizes on the elements that i desire.nnThanks,nMichaeln
Viewing 2 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Why is Adaptive Sizing not recommended in the mesh manual?’ is closed to new replies.
[bingo_chatbox]