TAGGED: Suggestion, topology-optimization-fluent, warning
-
-
October 30, 2021 at 8:30 amuser deletedSubscriber
Subiter 18 : residual 4.09558e+00
Warning: AMG preconditioner correction is of poor quality.
Subiter 19 : residual 4.09553e+00
Warning: AMG preconditioner correction is of poor quality.
Subiter 20 : residual 4.09552e+00
(Ref: Subiter 0 : residual 4.09578e+00)
59 7.2506e-02 1.8208e-01 1.4449e-01 2.2747e-01 7.8608e-03 3.3508e-03 04:23:02 442
Subiter 0 : residual 4.09552e+00
Warning: the residual minimization scheme stalls, therefore the scheme is initialized and the adjoint advancement is terminated.
** Suggestion: increase the number of modes in the residual minimization scheme if there is enough memory.
Good afternoon, I'm solving a topological optimization problem. When solving, a warning is issued and further solution does not go. What does this mean? I have been working in Fluent Fluent for 1 year and there has never been such a problem. Mesh triangular
after that the solution stops
November 1, 2021 at 2:13 pmRobForum ModeratorIt's the multigrid and may mean your optimiser routine/approach is struggling. Can you check you're not about to lose a surface or fold something so the topology is changing?
November 1, 2021 at 3:27 pmuser deletedSubscriberThanks Rob, I have converted the grid into hexes. The error is gone. The stream spins and turns 90 degrees. I redid the grid into hexes and everything was fine. The quality message appears but does not give an error. Did I want to ask you a fluent that solves the optimization problem with all types of meshes ?. Sorry for my English"
November 1, 2021 at 4:02 pmRobForum ModeratorThe optimisers should work well with tets, and also hex depending on the remeshing. The only problem I can see with the above is if the restriction towards the outlet distorts too much at a corner for the remeshing tools.
November 5, 2021 at 11:29 amuser deletedSubscriberHow can this influence be reduced? Decrease mesh size? or make a thickening?
November 5, 2021 at 12:16 pmRobForum ModeratorHave a look at the mesh to see what's happened to the model. The flow/shape may not be much use for engineering data but it'll give some hints into what is going on.
November 5, 2021 at 5:28 pmuser deletedSubscriberThank you so much !!!!
January 8, 2022 at 4:34 amphuocdinhSubscriberHello sir!
I am having the same problem as you said. It distorts too much at some angle for the rework tools.
How should i solve this problem?
January 10, 2022 at 12:34 pmRobForum ModeratorThat depends on what's happening. You may need to manually remesh and then continue the run or add limits to the model deformation. Some pictures would help.
January 11, 2022 at 12:31 pmphuocdinhSubscriberThank you so much !!!!
January 13, 2022 at 11:44 pmJanuary 14, 2022 at 11:28 amRobForum ModeratorThat may be how you've set the constraints and observables. What are you getting?
January 15, 2022 at 3:22 amphuocdinhSubscriberi didn't' set constraints. my observable is drop pressure. i am using direct Interpolation morphing method . smoothness equal to 2.
January 17, 2022 at 9:29 amRobForum ModeratorWhat's to stop the block ballooning out or collapsing?
Viewing 13 reply threads- The topic ‘what is this warning?’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussions- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Script error Code: 800a000d
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- error udf
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
Top Contributors-
1216
-
543
-
523
-
225
-
209
Top Rated Tags© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-