We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
Preprocessing

Preprocessing

Topics related to geometry, meshing, and CAD.

What is the future of ICEM CFD?

    • highhopes
      Subscriber

      Dear users, admins, moderators and ANSYS employees,


      May I kindly ask firstly how we can keep ourselves updated about the fates of the software we are the most familiar within ANSYS?


      And what is the fate of Icem CFD? I have been using this software ever since I did my first CFD study and I am still amazed by how effective a tool it can be after a long-term experience simply because you can block structure a geometry and avoid a lot of mesh-related issues afterwards. 


      But now I see mentions of Icem CFD in posts in which people recommend an "upgrade" to other meshing tools such as ANSYS Meshing and Fluent Meshing. Moreover, even though those options receive a lot of updates and bug fixes, Icem CFD does not seem to change anymore. You can simply see this by checking out the interface. I am an experienced and a fast user of Icem CFD and I want to keep on meshing the geometries in a block-structured manner. I have tried both of the other options and I saw a steep learning curve because they were unable to give me the mesh in the time window I had. Too many skewed cells, many options not user-friendly at all to people who know even a lot about meshing, and who attempted to use them in a few simple cases. I know that there is a big scientific community using actively Icem CFD and I guess it would be very beneficial for all of us to know what the future holds for CFD grid generation.


      Kindest regards


       

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • The topic ‘What is the future of ICEM CFD?’ is closed to new replies.