-
-
October 18, 2018 at 9:08 am
Adisa
SubscriberHi,
I am doing static analysis, and I got this warning:
Two or more remote boundary conditions are sharing a common face, edge, or vertex.  This behavior can cause solver overconstraint and is not recommended, please check results carefully. You may select the offending object and/or geometry via RMB on this warning in the Messages window.
Can anyone halp?
-
October 18, 2018 at 10:27 am
Arwel Davies
Ansys Employee Hi Adisa,
Do you have a boundary condition that has a common edge?
-
October 18, 2018 at 1:26 pm
Sandeep Medikonda
Ansys EmployeeAdisa, If you think you set up your simulation correctly. You can ignore those warnings.
-
October 20, 2018 at 12:49 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberHi Adisa,
I always ignore those warnings because I know my Boundary Conditions do not conflict. I drew two figures below to illustrate when BCs are and are not in conflict. In these figures, there is a red displacement BC and a blue displacement BC. There is only one DOF being set by these BCs and that is one normal to the edge (or face if this was 3D) and let's say it is a 1 mm displacement. There is a common vertex (or edge if this was 3D). Think about how that vertex is being told to move in the two figures. In the top figure, it has to move vertically up by 1 mm and horizontally by 1 mm. That vertex can do both of those without a conflict.
Now think about the bottom figure, that common vertex is being told to move at 45 degrees by 1 mm and to move horizontally by 1 mm. It's impossible to satisfy both of those requirements simultaneously. That is what the warning is for.
Regards,
Peter -
June 26, 2023 at 11:24 am
tocnaza
SubscriberÂ
You can ignore those warnings.
https://www.serialzone.cz/uzivatele/194392-publiwebmaxter/
https://sortitoutsi.net/user/profile/2029960
https://www.wildlabs.net/members/jinetex
https://www.conseilsparissportifs.fr/forum/users/jinetex/
https://www.janome.com/support/janome-forum/forum-room/forum-topic/?tid=8108
https://bio-protocol.org/userhome.aspx?id=1420380
https://swaay.com/u/publiwebmaxter/about/
https://macuisineturque.fr/author/sherpax/
https://www.stickermule.com/eu/u/sherpax
https://cnxus.org/members/cienlatas/
https://boilingsteam.com/profile/barillax
https://autotest.com.ar/author/pedantex/
https://www.acto.org.uk/user-profile/don.peri/
https://www.vitalmtb.com/community/siropex/blog/03/13/2023/entry/97271
https://app.impactplus.com/users/carlo-pantojo
https://www.thebmc.co.uk/profile?id=59124
https://appsliced.co/u/publiwebmaxter
https://www.investagrams.com/profile/pedritocapo
https://pangian.com/user/lorenzorikelme/
https://www.dcfever.com/users/profile.php?id=1155621
https://veganfooduk.co.uk/profile/burinot/
https://www.mochub.com/user/55778
https://community.creatio.com/user/200861
https://gwar.net/a/bohabs/users/136655
https://www.evtv.me/author/troglod/
https://brain-market.com/u/pillastre
https://forum.peplink.com/u/zoraya
https://letsloop.com/bandidoxÂ
-
June 28, 2023 at 3:43 am
Numbers Summers
SubscriberThe warning message you received indicates that two or more remote boundary conditions in your static analysis are sharing a common face, edge, or vertex. This situation can lead to overconstraint in the solver house of hazards, potentially causing inaccurate results.
-
September 19, 2023 at 4:21 am
Jessie Kiehn
SubscriberIf you face difficulties, experience mr mine. It can help you improve your health and mood.
-
- The topic ‘warning’ is closed to new replies.
-
3472
-
1057
-
1051
-
940
-
902
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.