Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

under Relaxation Factors

    • 617283443
      Subscriber

      Hi experts!

      When performing numerical simulations in Fluent, how can one determine whether computational divergence stems from an improperly set under Relaxation Factors? If the under Relaxation Factors be set too low, computational time may become excessively prolonged. How should the under Relaxation Factors be appropriately configured to ensure convergence while minimising iteration time?

    • zongbo.wei
      Subscriber

      The default value is applicable in most cases.You can refer to the following steps to find the optimal value.

      • Start with default URFs recommended by Fluent for your physics and solver type (e.g., 0.7–0.8 for pressure in PISO, 0.2–0.5 for VOF, 0.5 for Reynolds stresses in RSM).  
      • If divergence occurs, decrease URFs incrementally (e.g., reduce by 0.1–0.2) for the problematic variable(s). For multiphase or mixture models, begin with low URFs (0.2 or less for slip velocity) and increase gradually if convergence is good. 
      • Avoid setting URFs too low unless necessary for stability; values below 0.1 should be used only temporarily and increased once the solution stabilizes. 
      • For turbulent flows, modifying only the URFs for turbulence variables (rather than all variables) may yield better convergence. 
      • 617283443
        Subscriber

        Thank you for your reply. How am I to know which one is my problematic variable(s)?

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.