-
-
July 3, 2018 at 10:13 pmJosé MantovaniSubscriber
Hello everyone!
I'm setting up my 2D simulation process for aerodynamic profile, and thinking about the turbulence model I came across a question. The conditions are as follows:
U = 12 m / s
c (chord length) = 0.575 m
operating at Standard air 20 ° C
And calculating the Reynolds number for this flow, Re = 470000.
So I decided to use SA turbulence model, k-epsilon Realizable and SST k-omega.
According to the literature, for external flows, around a Reynolds number of 500000 we have a turbulent flow.
So, it gave me a doubt, which would be more correct: to use these models in which I quoted or some model of transition?
Thanks for opportunity!
Mantovani.
-
July 4, 2018 at 7:21 amAmine Ben Hadj AliAnsys Employee
Hi,
I recommend carry out a sensitivity analysis an compare the results to a transition model. You can start by using the intermittency transition model (3-Eqn model)
Â
A.
-
- The topic ‘Transition or Turbulence Model?’ is closed to new replies.
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- error udf
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
- Facing trouble regarding setting up boundary conditions for SOEC Modeling
- UDF, Fluent: Access count of iterations for “Steady Statistics”
-
1416
-
599
-
591
-
565
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.