-
-
December 14, 2025 at 2:15 pm
scabo
SubscriberHi
I am running an unsteady DPM simulation. I want to average the particle properties, like vectors of velocity, contour plots, etc. on the pipe cross-section over a period of time. How and where shall I do it? Is it possible to do it in Fluent/CFDPost or Paraview?
2. Also my flow is converging at a point inside the pipe but the particle proeprties like vel magnitude or dpm conc. is not converging even when i run for 30s of real time. What could be the issue?
thanks
-
December 15, 2025 at 12:25 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorIf you mean the contours generated on surfaces of DPM Variables then creating a Custom Field Function of the value of interest and then using the time statistics in the Solve>Iterate panel should work to get the average and then you plot that on a surface.Â
I have no idea regarding the second point, but are the values showing repeating pattern (ie it's transient)?Â
-
December 15, 2025 at 2:12 pm
scabo
SubscriberÂ
Hi-thanks for reply. Are you talking about turning on the Data Sampling for Time Statistics box on? If I do this, then in Results i should get the time averaged quantities? Secondly, I was talking of vectors of time-averaged velocity for a period of time. After doing unsteady statistics, I could not transfer the DPM vectors into CFDPost or Paraview because they are not comptible-so is Fluent the only option?
Â
2. I have seeing some repeating patterns but the difference is sometimes quite large to say that it is converging at some value. I have attached the convergence result for dpm velocity mag (y axis) vs iteration(x axis) for unsteady solver. Is this converging or do I need to continue further?

Â
-
December 15, 2025 at 2:31 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorThe time averaged data is for scalar fields, and is as you think. You can plot RMS-particle-x-velocity but not the RMS-particle-vector. It's likely Fluent only unless you add those CFFs/RMS fields to the .cdat file.Â
If the model is transient then iteration number is meaningless, if it's steady state then the particle update frequency may play a part in the convergence. Given the plot is also not an averaged value it's difficult to read.Â
-
December 15, 2025 at 5:04 pm
scabo
Subscriber -
December 15, 2025 at 5:15 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorEach point being at a different time step?Â
-
December 15, 2025 at 5:23 pm
scabo
SubscriberThis result is at a given point in pipe. Yes each point on the graph is at different time-step or flow time. I have given the time-step=0.001 for flow and 0.0001 for particles. Is this procedure correct for monitoring flow convergence?
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
4602
-
1510
-
1386
-
1209
-
1021
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
