-
-
July 26, 2024 at 1:38 pmandre_costaSubscriber
Hi,
I'm making a stiffness verification of the present swaybar and I'm getting a completely different result in terms of motion when I change the bonded contact to frictional contact. I didn't expected a big diference in terms of the displacement much less in terms of diferent motion. when I supress the contact, (Frictional or Bonded) I get an error related to a node that in presented in the center of the middle bar.Â
Someone can explain the reason for both scenarios ?Â
Â
-
July 28, 2024 at 3:34 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
Hi Andre,
Bonded contact is a linear contact and can be solved using a linear solution while Frictional contact is nonlinear and requires a nonlinear solution method. That may be the reason for a large difference in results.
You can force the bonded contact to use a nonlinear solution method by turning on the Large Deflection setting under Analysis Settings. Make this change for both the Bonded and the Frictional models and get a fresh Solution for each one. Does that make the results any closer?
It would be good to see the size of the elements being used in this model. There should be at least 2 elements through the thickness of all the bars.
-
- The topic ‘Stiffness Study – Contact problem’ is closed to new replies.
- Problem with access to session files
- Ayuda con Error: “Unable to access the source: EngineeringData”
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Error when opening saved Workbench project
- Geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements
- How to select the interface delamination surface of a laminate?
- How to apply Compression-only Support?
- Timestep range set for animation export
- SMART crack under fatigue conditions, different crack sizes can’t growth
- Image to file in Mechanical is bugged and does not show text
-
1191
-
513
-
488
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.