-
-
December 25, 2023 at 8:06 am
Howie Fong
SubscriberHi everyone,
Recently, I encountered an issue while designing modulators. Why don't the modulator devices in INTERCONNECT distinguish between TE/TM modes? For instance, in devices such as the "Optical Modulator," "Optical Ring," and "M-Z Modulator," the actual phase change induced by the modulation signal should differ slightly between the TE and TM modes. However, we cannot modify the device parameters to account for different polarization states. What is the reason behind this design choice? Additionally, how should I configure the system if I aim to consider the polarization state issues of the modulator?
I am looking forward to your response!
-
January 6, 2024 at 1:15 am
Kyle
Ansys EmployeeHello, the active components generally only have a single set of data for all modes. I'm not sure what the original reasoning behind this was, I would assume it was for simplicity. If you like, you can submit a feature request for this here:Â Ideas (lumerical.com)
I think the simplest way to do a simulation with different properties for each mode in the active components would be to make separate circuits for each mode. Do you think this would work for your application?
-
- The topic ‘state of polarization issue of modulator components within interconnect’ is closed to new replies.
- Difference between answers in version 2024 and 2017 lumerical mode solution
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- Import material .txt file with script
- Trapezoidal ring
- Help for qINTERCONNECT
- Absorption cross-section of AuNR excited by prism-based TIR
- Issues with getting result from interconnent analysis script
- Topology Optimization Error
- How to measure transmission coefficients on a given plane .
- Edge Coupler EME Example Issue
-
1932
-
828
-
599
-
591
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.