-
-
February 11, 2022 at 7:46 amSampath kumar A V NSubscriber
In motor, I am simulating for the performance characteristics of induction motor.in the efficiency plot I am getting a different plot at a higher speed.
February 11, 2022 at 10:32 amRobForum ModeratorWhat do you add into the model as boundary conditions etc? Higher speed means more power, but also (possibly) better heat transfer for cooling, and more drag on the moving parts. If you say which solver you're using I can move this to the correct physics group too.
February 14, 2022 at 6:11 amSampath kumar A V NSubscriberI am very much thankful for the reply sir....I am using motorCAD tool for simulation
February 14, 2022 at 6:41 amSampath kumar A V NSubscriberI am very much thankful for the reply. I am simulating the motor in the MotorCAD software tool. In MotorCAD may I know how to check for solver details
February 15, 2022 at 2:02 pmkkimiabeAnsys EmployeeDear Sampa The difference between Motoring and Generating mode efficiency is a real-life difference, and is due to the opposite direction of the power flow, hence the current, in your equivalent EMachine circuit. To visualize this better, you can analyze the equivalent circuit model of your IM design (the circuit parameters are available in Motor-CAD EMAG module under the OUTPUT tab)and compare the input and output power for the motoring and generating modes by simply reversing the direction of the current, whilst keeping the terminal voltage polarity fixed. Depending on your RL circuit parameters, the difference of efficiency can be minor or major. Please let us know if this clarifies. Kind regards. Kia
July 19, 2023 at 8:42 amPrashant M. PSubscriberHi, I'm trying to simulate battery thermal runaway by mechanical abuse, but i am getting this in console while simulating, need suggestions on how to overcome this problem.Â
Updating solution at time level N...
done.
Â
iter energy uds-0 uds-1 time/iter
11820 8.0448e-17 1.0015e-15 7.0804e-12 0:01:51 20
ida_check_flag<0! in p2d function
Â
ida solver failed when calling echem submodel in a normal call: Vp=0.000000 Vn=0.000000
ida_check_flag<0! in p2d function
Â
IDA returns error code: -14 11821 1.1303e-07 5.9998e-13 3.9534e-09 0:01:48 19
ida_check_flag<0! in p2d function
Â
ida solver failed when calling echem submodel in a normal call: Vp=0.000000 Vn=0.000000
Â
IDA returns error code: -14 11822 2.1652e-12 4.6339e-13 3.0591e-09 0:01:43 18
ida_check_flag<0! in p2d function
Â
ida solver failed when calling echem submodel in a normal call: Vp=0.000000 Vn=0.000000
Â
IDA returns error code: -14 11823 5.1477e-14 2.5213e-13 1.6627e-09 0:01:38 17
Â
Viewing 5 reply threads- The topic ‘Simulation Doubt’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussions- Workbench license error
- Unexpected error on Workbench: Root element not found.
- Unexpected issues with SCCM deployment of Ansys Fluids and Structures 2024 R1
- access to path files denied error
- AQWA: Hydrodynamic response error
- Questions and recommendations: Septum Horn Antenna
- Tutorial or Help for 2 way FSI
- Unable to connect to the license
- Moment Reaction probe with Large deformation
- Ansys with Vmware and CPU configuration : I’m lost, good practice?
Top Contributors-
1762
-
635
-
599
-
591
-
366
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-