-
-
January 24, 2024 at 12:32 am
minusunny
SubscriberI would like to simulate MMI , both ports. When i do the s-parameter extraction for the power should i look atÂ
abs^2(S11),abs^2(S12),abs^2(S13),abs^2(S14) - For the power at output ports because of port 1
 and abs^2(S31),abs^2(S32),abs^2(S33),abs^2(S34) -For the power at output ports because of port 3?
Also , the values i get for transmission is different from S- parameter sweep (Same as T expansion monitor value) but that values does not make sense, but the Transmission 'T' values look reasonable.
How can i get that value?
How can i get transmission values from the s parameter sweep?
 Is there an alternate way to do this simulation ?
Â
Thank you
Â
-
January 25, 2024 at 9:58 am
Niki Papachristou
Ansys EmployeeHi Minusunny,
Thank you for reaching out to us. Have you gone through our application gallery example: Multi-Mode Interference (MMI) Coupler? I think the described procedure is very similar to what you want to achive.
Kind Regards,
Niki
-
January 26, 2024 at 7:54 pm
minusunny
SubscriberI am using SWG based MMI. Can i use EME? I used FDTD for that. Can i use the same s parameter extraction for FDTD? Also, i did an s parameter sweep in FDTD and saved the sparameter value in lumerical format and exported it to the interconnect i got this error:
SPAR_1: Fitting for '256' coefficients...
SPAR_1: Error in fit is '0.00109188'.
SPAR_1: Calculating filter coefficients at '1.931e+14' Hz ...
SPAR_1: Fitting for '256' coefficients...
SPAR_1: Error in fit is '0.00171933'.
SPAR_1: Calculating filter coefficients at '1.931e+14' Hz ...
SPAR_1: Fitting for '256' coefficients...
SPAR_1: Error in fit is '0.0020334'.
SPAR_1: Calculating filter coefficients at '1.931e+14' Hz ...
SPAR_1: Fitting for '256' coefficients...
SPAR_1: Error in fit is '0.00203526'.
Â
Is it because i did not use the right format to export?
-
- The topic ‘Simulate two ports of MMI’ is closed to new replies.
-
3372
-
1052
-
1050
-
886
-
837
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.