We’re putting the final touches on our new badges platform. Badge issuance remains temporarily paused, but all completions are being recorded and will be fulfilled once the platform is live. Thank you for your patience.
Photonics

Photonics

Topics related to Lumerical and more.

Simulate two ports of MMI

    • minusunny
      Subscriber

      I would like to simulate MMI , both ports. When i do the s-parameter extraction for the power  should i look at 

      abs^2(S11),abs^2(S12),abs^2(S13),abs^2(S14) - For the power at output ports because of port 1

       and abs^2(S31),abs^2(S32),abs^2(S33),abs^2(S34) -For the power at output ports because of port 3?

      Also , the values i get for transmission is different from S- parameter sweep (Same as T expansion monitor value) but that values does not make sense, but the Transmission 'T' values look reasonable.

      How can i get that value?

      How can i get transmission values from the s parameter sweep?

       Is there an alternate way to do this simulation ?

       

      Thank you

       

    • Niki Papachristou
      Ansys Employee

      Hi Minusunny,

      Thank you for reaching out to us. Have you gone through our application gallery example: Multi-Mode Interference (MMI) Coupler? I think the described procedure is very similar to what you want to achive.

      Kind Regards,

      Niki

    • minusunny
      Subscriber

      I am using SWG based MMI.  Can i use EME? I used FDTD for that. Can i use the same s parameter extraction for FDTD? Also, i did an s parameter sweep in FDTD and saved the sparameter value in lumerical format and exported it to the interconnect i got this error:

      SPAR_1: Fitting for '256' coefficients...

      SPAR_1: Error in fit is '0.00109188'.

      SPAR_1: Calculating filter coefficients at '1.931e+14' Hz ...

      SPAR_1: Fitting for '256' coefficients...

      SPAR_1: Error in fit is '0.00171933'.

      SPAR_1: Calculating filter coefficients at '1.931e+14' Hz ...

      SPAR_1: Fitting for '256' coefficients...

      SPAR_1: Error in fit is '0.0020334'.

      SPAR_1: Calculating filter coefficients at '1.931e+14' Hz ...

      SPAR_1: Fitting for '256' coefficients...

      SPAR_1: Error in fit is '0.00203526'.

       

      Is it because i did not use the right format to export?

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Simulate two ports of MMI’ is closed to new replies.