-
-
July 2, 2024 at 9:48 pm
matt
SubscriberFolks, the results from response spectrum lose their sign during the MCOM arithmetic. What if I added syntax to the MCOM file to store the sign for the node and element results prior to the arithmetic in MCOM and then reapplied the signs afterward?  Do you think that’s plausible, or does that upend the basic theory of the combination somehow?
-
July 5, 2024 at 3:32 pm
dlooman
Ansys EmployeeI don't see how that could work. The sign of the node and element results could be plus or minus depending on the mode. You could create your own combination method in which you algebraically sum the model results without doing any squaring.
-
July 5, 2024 at 3:36 pm
danielshaw
Ansys EmployeeWhat is your goal?
For a response spectrum analysis, the contribution from the individual modes must be summed. The direction is not known, so some form of SRSS is used. What signs are you saving and how will you reapply them?
-
- The topic ‘Response Spectrum Sign Loss’ is closed to new replies.
- The legend values are not changing.
- LPBF Simulation of dissimilar materials in ANSYS mechanical (Thermal Transient)
- Convergence error in modal analysis
- How to model a bimodular material in Mechanical
- APDL, memory, solid
- Meaning of the error
- Simulate a fan on the end of shaft
- Nonlinear load cases combinations
- Real Life Example of a non-symmetric eigenvalue problem
- How can the results of Pressures and Motions for all elements be obtained?
-
3907
-
1414
-
1256
-
1118
-
1015
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.