TAGGED: HPC-GPU-HFSS
-
-
September 27, 2021 at 2:03 pmGeorgMSubscriber
Hi there,
the official HFSS documentation recommends the Intel Xeon Phi 7120A (MIC, not GPU) for the acceleration of the direct solver with the multi-frontal approach. However, this co-processor card seems to be out of production. I know there are a few on eBay.
Are there alternatives? How does this co-processor compare to simply using multiple CPUs? Thanks for your answer.
September 28, 2021 at 12:11 amAndyJPSubscriberNot sure about Phi. But the code for CUDA works
1 - with simple isotropic dielectrics only. No anisotropy, or ferrite anisotropy is handled by GPU code.
2 - Non-enterprise GPUs are now artificially locked from execution. Even though Geforce supports all the CUDA capabilities of TESLA and Quadro, it was locked by some very dark(and forbidden even to guess) reasons from use.
3 - Only generations of nVidia Quadro and Tesla boards listed in the comptibility list are supported.
4 - Since ANSYS may lock non-listed Quadro and Tesla boards any time, despite the equivalence of CUDA capabilities with the listed boards, you have to consider purchasing exactly the boards from the list. Even if those are 10 times expensive and inferior to other boards on the market.... At least buy from the same series.
Not very nice, indeed. Particularly when comparing with the other software on the market.
September 28, 2021 at 5:38 amGeorgMSubscriberThanks Andy as far as I understand the direct solver cannot be accelerated with a GPU. This works in part for the iterative solver and reasonably well for the transient solver. According to the documentation, the direct solver can only be accelerated by the Phi, which is not a GPU. No clue about what is the difference to a GPU. The obvious difference is that you cannot use a MIC to drive a display.
September 28, 2021 at 7:43 amAndyJPSubscriber>as far as I understand the direct solver cannot be accelerated with a GPU.
As I said, it can be accelerated with GPU, unless you use anisotropic media in your design. there may be more restrictions, which I did not find. ANSYS treacherously refuses to disclose all the limitations and requirements. But with simple copper on isotropic PCB the nVidia Quadro RTX board gives a well visible acceleration at the matrix solving step.
I was running it with Quadro used for the main display at the same time.
The restrictions on use of Geforce are purely artificial, probably defined by the management team.
September 28, 2021 at 7:47 amGeorgMSubscriberThanks again. I misunderstood that and I'll give it a try.
Viewing 4 reply threads- The topic ‘Recommendation for Acceleration of Direct Solver in HFSS’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussions- HFSS Incident Plane Wave excitement mode
- Question for Maxwell
- Simulation of capacitor combining eddy currents with displacement currents
- How to calculate eddy and hysteresis losses of the core?
- Ansys Maxwell 3D – eddy current
- How to determine initial position in motion setup
- dq graph non-conformity
- How to customize pulse waveform and injection site in microstrip array
- 180 Degree Phase Shift When Measuring S21
- Simplorer+Maxwell Cosimulation results and Maxwell results mismatch
Top Contributors-
1281
-
591
-
544
-
524
-
366
Top Rated Tags© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-