TAGGED: blood-flow, convergence, fluent, fluent-uds, uds, under-relaxation-factor
-
-
June 1, 2023 at 5:37 pm
cibi
SubscriberHello everyone,Â
I am trying to compute the platelet lysis index (PLI) in my simulations by solving this transport equation:Â
where tau is the shear stress.Â
My simulations are steady state, so if I have understood correctly from Ansys Fluent User Guide, this is the type of equation I am solving in Fluent with the diffusion coefficient equal to zero:
I have prepared the UDF for my source term:
To obtain convergence in my simulations I had to change the under relaxation factor of my UDS to 0.50.
After runnign my simulation I use CFD post to compute the power of my scalar (PLI = scalar 0 ^(1/0.77)).
I am expecting a PLI distribution similar to this:
But the resuls that I get are like this:
Â
I also tried on a simplier geometry and I think that the results are stil wrong in terms of values but the colormap is more similar to what I am supposed to obtain:
I was wondering if there is something wrong in my code for the source term or if this might be related to something else?
Thank you in advance!
Claudia
-
June 2, 2023 at 12:48 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorWhat scalar diffusion did you set? How turbulent is the flow?
-
June 2, 2023 at 1:43 pm
-
June 2, 2023 at 1:48 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorI'd set the Diffusion coefficient as a very (e-14 or so) small number rather than zero. Zero's can cause problems if you divide!Â
How well refined is the mesh? What other settings did the paper(?) use or report?Â
-
June 12, 2023 at 5:34 pm
cibi
SubscriberI have run a simulation with diffusion coefficient set to e-14 and indeed results look better. However, the values of my uds are still very small.Â
This is with the local scale:
This is with user defined scale:
Â
Regarding my mesh, I have got 3'060'421 elements and this is how it looks like:
In terms of the settings of the paper, simulations are unsteady state and laminar flow, no-flux (for PLI ) conditions were applied at the walls and PLI= 0Â at the inlet.
I was wondering if there is something wrong in my code or something I am missing when adapting my equation to the one that Fluent solves?
Thank you very much!
-
June 13, 2023 at 9:01 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorPossibly, but that's not something I can really comment on.Â
The mesh isn't great. It looks refined enough on the cross channels but it's very coarse down the longer sections. Have a look at decomposition (break up the geometry) and then sweep/multizone.Â
-
- The topic ‘problem in solving transport equation using UDS’ is closed to new replies.
-
3492
-
1057
-
1051
-
965
-
942
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.