Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Pressure swirl atomizer model and periodic boundary condition

    • sjohn
      Subscriber

      My case is similar to Chapter 2: Modeling Evaporating Liquid Spray in the Ansys Fluent Tutorials, with the following notable exceptions.

      - Instead of a an air-blast atomizer, the injection is performed using a pressure swirl atomizer.
      - Periodic boundary condition: Instead of 30-degree wedge, my case has a 22.5 degree wedge as the domain. 
      - Instead of swirling air, air is introduced parallel to the main axis.

      For the pressure swirl atomizer injection properties, I have specificd the azimuthal start and end angles as 0 and 22.5 degree. Despite this, the display shows a 360 degree cone and the droplets are sprayed outside the domain (22.5 degree wedge). When I run the case, I also get an error saying the droplets were sprayed outside the domain.

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      The injection display is "dumb" in that it's just a graphic and doesn't reflect any angle settings - it's an aid to make sure you've got the injection in the right place and point in the right direction. Assuming the sector modelled is 0 to 22.5 degrees and not 90 to 112.5 or similar try reducing the band to 0.5 to 22.0 and see if that changes. Any parcels that miss the domain are automatically fail. It should be a warning rather than an error, and should also show a fraction of mass/parcels that are missing. 

    • sjohn
      Subscriber

      I was able to solve this issue by moving the injection point slighly into the domain. Initially, I had set the injection point at one of the vertices of the wedge but it gave me the warning (as mentioned in my first post). When I ran the case after moving the point into the domain, it did not give me a warning but the position of the injection point does not accurately represent my test article because it is not at the vertex (desired) but inside (actual) as shown in my schematic below.

       

       

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      If it's precisely on the vertex it may be "outside" due to rounding effects. You should be fine if it's a tiny amount into the first wedge cell. I've seen similar problems on circumferential injections where the defined point is on the curved face but fractionally outside the faceted representation of the curved face. 

    • sjohn
      Subscriber

      The issue with my current apporach is that it models an injection point in one wedge, which due to the periodic condition causes there to be multiple injection points. In reality there is a single pressure swirl atomizer at the center (vertex), which sprays fluid into each wedge. This should be a common scenario, wonder how is such a case setup.

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      If you set the injection with a full 360 cone what happens? Make sure you've got more than 64 streams to ensure there are no half-angle effects for parcel injection placement. 

    • sjohn
      Subscriber

      My guess is that an injection with a full 360 degree cone would give warning similar to the case in which the injection point was at the vertex and the cone was 22.5 deg (difference between azimuthal start and end angles).
      I am using 16 streams total because there are 16 sectors (wedges) of 22.5 deg in reality. I figured it would be good to have only one stream in each sector/wedge. The flowrate specified by me in Injection Settings/Point Properties is 6.88e-05 kg/s. 

      Can you explain the significance of 64 streams?

Viewing 6 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.