TAGGED: lumerical, Lumeriical, RCWA
-
-
July 15, 2023 at 5:14 pm
Eugene Su
SubscriberIn the Lumerical 2023 R1.3 Version 8.29.3401 RCWA simulation, two simulations were performed with the same structure and settings, except for the materials and maximum wavelength.
In the first simulation, the materials and minimum wavelength were 0.24 μm, and the maximum wavelength was 0.44 μm.
In the second simulation, the materials and minimum wavelength were 0.24 μm, and the maximum wavelength was 0.64 μm.
When comparing the Es.Ex data from the RCWAFieldMonitor at a wavelength of 2.4e-07, they are completely different.
Is this correct?
Thanks.
-
July 17, 2023 at 11:04 pm
Guilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeIt is most likely due to material fitting. Although RCWA is frequency-domain solver, currently it still uses multi-coefficient model:
so when the wavelength range changes, the fitted result may be different. For the same geometry, different material will lead to different result. So please make sure the fitting wavelength range is the same for the two cases:
Please try and check if the result is about the same, if not exactly the same.
Â
-
July 18, 2023 at 3:58 am
Eugene Su
SubscriberThank you for your response.
Both simulation settings have the option "override materials frequency range" checked.
-
-
July 18, 2023 at 4:42 pm
Guilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeÂ
Then please check if the diffraction angles (theta and phi) are the same. The monitor should give E field for each diffraction order (defined by theta and phi).
Â
-
July 19, 2023 at 3:30 am
-
-
July 19, 2023 at 5:09 am
-
July 19, 2023 at 10:00 pm
Guilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeI tested a dispersive material but could not duplicate this issue when I used:
setnamed("RCWA","use wavelength spacing",1);
and override the material fitting wavelength range to be the same, for exmple 0.4~0.7um, whereas I tested 0.4~0.5um for 6 points,and 0.4~0.6um for 11 points for a silicon slab with air holes (adpoted from online example https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/4414567929235-rcwa-Script-command the script "rcwa" is depreciated now).
Maybe you can choose visualze the max frequency point and see if they agree.
-
- The topic ‘Peculiar RCWA Simulation Results. Seems to be a bug?’ is closed to new replies.
- Import material .txt file with script
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- Absorption cross-section of AuNR excited by prism-based TIR
- How to measure transmission coefficients on a given plane .
- TE Polarization Fraction + Waveguide TE/TM Fraction
- Edge Coupler EME Example Issue
- Lumerical Python API Topology Optimization Error 2025 R1
- 2D inverse design grating coupler
- FDE : Simulation waveguides with electrodes
- Loss of lithium niobate phase modulator
-
2337
-
925
-
599
-
591
-
527
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.