TAGGED: lumerical, Lumeriical, RCWA
-
-
July 15, 2023 at 5:14 pmEugene SuSubscriber
In the Lumerical 2023 R1.3 Version 8.29.3401 RCWA simulation, two simulations were performed with the same structure and settings, except for the materials and maximum wavelength.
In the first simulation, the materials and minimum wavelength were 0.24 μm, and the maximum wavelength was 0.44 μm.
In the second simulation, the materials and minimum wavelength were 0.24 μm, and the maximum wavelength was 0.64 μm.
When comparing the Es.Ex data from the RCWAFieldMonitor at a wavelength of 2.4e-07, they are completely different.
Is this correct?
Thanks.
-
July 17, 2023 at 11:04 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
It is most likely due to material fitting. Although RCWA is frequency-domain solver, currently it still uses multi-coefficient model:
so when the wavelength range changes, the fitted result may be different. For the same geometry, different material will lead to different result. So please make sure the fitting wavelength range is the same for the two cases:
Please try and check if the result is about the same, if not exactly the same.
Â
-
July 18, 2023 at 3:58 amEugene SuSubscriber
Thank you for your response.
Both simulation settings have the option "override materials frequency range" checked.
-
-
July 18, 2023 at 4:42 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
Â
Then please check if the diffraction angles (theta and phi) are the same. The monitor should give E field for each diffraction order (defined by theta and phi).
Â
-
July 19, 2023 at 3:30 am
-
-
July 19, 2023 at 5:09 am
-
July 19, 2023 at 10:00 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
I tested a dispersive material but could not duplicate this issue when I used:
setnamed("RCWA","use wavelength spacing",1);
and override the material fitting wavelength range to be the same, for exmple 0.4~0.7um, whereas I tested 0.4~0.5um for 6 points,and 0.4~0.6um for 11 points for a silicon slab with air holes (adpoted from online example https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/4414567929235-rcwa-Script-command the script "rcwa" is depreciated now).
Maybe you can choose visualze the max frequency point and see if they agree.
-
- The topic ‘Peculiar RCWA Simulation Results. Seems to be a bug?’ is closed to new replies.
- Difference between answers in version 2024 and 2017 lumerical mode solution
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- Import material .txt file with script
- Trapezoidal ring
- Help for qINTERCONNECT
- Absorption cross-section of AuNR excited by prism-based TIR
- Issues with getting result from interconnent analysis script
- How to measure transmission coefficients on a given plane .
- Topology Optimization Error
-
1421
-
599
-
591
-
565
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.