-
-
February 26, 2023 at 12:33 pmKin Wing WongSubscriber
In FLUENT meshing, I can generate mesh with a single periodicity condition. When it comes to multiple periodicity, the auto-meshing of the volume mesh gives an error,
Error: Multiple periodicity definitions are detected. You can only perform auto meshing
with a single periodic boundary definition.
Error Object: #fIs there a workaround to define multiple periodicity to have perfectly mapped mesh on both periodic surfaces?
-
February 27, 2023 at 1:33 pmFedericoAnsys Employee
Hello,Â
Multiple periodicity can be enabled by inserting a Custom Journal task in the Watertight geometry workflow. Here's a sample of the commands to enter:
(define source-id 47)
(define target-id 48)
(ti-set-size-field-periodicity "translational" '(0 25 0))
(ti-menu-load-string (format #f "~%/boundary recover-periodic-surfaces translational auto ~a ," source-id))(define source-id 49)
(define target-id 50)
(ti-set-size-field-periodicity "translational" '(-30 0 -30))
(ti-menu-load-string (format #f "~%/boundary recover-periodic-surfaces translational auto ~a ," source-id))
(enable-feature 'allow-multiple-periodicity)Â
Note that you will need to find the corresponding source/target ids for the corresponding faces in your setup and define the appropriate periodicity. The example above has 2 translational periodicity with vectors (0 25 0) and (-30 0 -30).
I hope this helps!
Federico
-
February 27, 2023 at 1:56 pmKin Wing WongSubscriber
Thank you for your reply. May I ask which version of Fluent meshing are you using? When I run the journal for enabling multiple periodcity, it shows me the error of,Â
ÂFeature allow-multiple-periodicity is not knownÂ#f -
February 27, 2023 at 2:02 pmFedericoAnsys Employee
This feature is supported in 22R2 and up.
-
February 27, 2023 at 2:03 pmKin Wing WongSubscriber
Thanks, then I will try again in the new version.
-
- The topic ‘Multiple periodicity definitions are detected.’ is closed to new replies.
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- error udf
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
- Facing trouble regarding setting up boundary conditions for SOEC Modeling
- UDF, Fluent: Access count of iterations for “Steady Statistics”
-
1406
-
599
-
591
-
555
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.