TAGGED: multiphase
-
-
February 14, 2021 at 5:46 pm
Allen P Varghese
SubscriberI am studying the effect of change in gravity on a tank that is filled up to 1/3rd of its volume with liquid N2. The tank has baffles and I am trying to study the sloshing effects. These are the settings I have enabled,nnMesh:nNumber of cells: 1,226,345nPolyhexacore mesh generated within Fluent watertight geometrynThe mesh is kept as coarse as possible for initial simulatioFluent Setup:nMultiphasenVolume of FluidnExplicit forumulationnImplicit body force enablednSharp interface modellingn2 Eulerian phasesnPhase1: n2gasnPhase2: n2liquidnNo surface tension between themnViscous: LaminarnNo inlet or outlet BCnCell register region defined for region to represent n2liquidnInitialized the whole domain with n2gas = 1, patched defined region with n2liquid = 1nMethodsnScheme: PISOnGradient: Least Squares Cell BasednPressure: Presto!nMomentum: Second Order UpwindnVolume Fraction: Geo-ReconstructnNon-Iterative Time Advancement has been enablednWarped Face Gradient Correction has been enablednControlsnDensity: 0.5nPressure: 0.5nBody Force: 0.5nMomentum: 0.5nSolver SettingsnType: AdaptivenMethod: Multiphase SpecificnDuration specification method: Total timenTotal time: 12secondsnGlobal Courant Number: 2nInitial time step size: 1e-05nFixed time step, reporting interval, time step update interval, profile update interval: 1nnI am running the simulation parallelly on 30 processors of Intel Xeon 4216 CPU @ 2.10 Ghz & 1 GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080Ti. 64GB 2400MHz RAM and 42GB GPU Memory.nThe simulation is taking a very long time (around 0.25 seconds of flow time has been simulated in 24 hours, 1%). Is there something I am doing wrong? Is there some way I can improve my timings.n -
February 14, 2021 at 7:34 pm
YasserSelima
SubscriberGeForce is not tested with Ansys Fluent. Try running without it. Even if tested, I am not sure about the feasibility of 1 GPU per 30 cores. It might be slowing down the simulations.nNon-iterative is definitely faster, but it might not catch the transition details. nIf you have high acceleration of the tank, you need to enable phase change and take surface tension into consideration. n -
February 14, 2021 at 7:40 pm
Allen P Varghese
SubscriberThank you for your reply. I will try your suggestions.n -
February 15, 2021 at 11:43 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorLook at the new Hybrid NITA scheme in 2021R1 and also review dynamic adaption. You may find you've got a fairly fine mesh everywhere which isn't needed. n -
February 15, 2021 at 1:45 pm
Amine Ben Hadj Ali
Ansys EmployeeDo not rely on GPU here: it won't add any value. Just invoke the Hybrid NITA schemes which are now accessible from Graphical User Interface. Also you might think about using smart Mesh Adaption + Multiphase Time Constraint in 2021R1.n
-
Viewing 4 reply threads
- The topic ‘Multiphase simulation taking too long’ is closed to new replies.
Innovation Space
Trending discussions
- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
Top Contributors
-
4042
-
1461
-
1308
-
1151
-
1021
Top Rated Tags
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.