-
-
April 7, 2024 at 8:20 pmweiSubscriber
Hi there,
I am modelling the laser welding process using Moving Heat Flux module in Ansys Mechanical.
I would like to see the maximum temperature of the welding surface. However, I found the max temperature changes significantly with the mesh element size, even though I have already extensively refined the mesh.
My thoery is that the heat load was applied on the first layer of mesh elements, so smaller the mesh elements lead to higher temperature rise.
May I ask if this is the case? Otherwise I couldn't think of any other reason that the maximum temperature keeps changing with the element size.
Please see my settings and mesh as below. Thank you a lot in advance and please let me know if there is anything unclear.
-
April 8, 2024 at 3:49 pmdloomanAnsys Employee
That's true in general, but if the time step is small enough the temperature shouldn't keep increasing. Initially there is no gradient through the thickness to conduct the heat so the enthalpy of the element adjacent to the surface determines the temperature. If the element is small the enthalpy will be less. But if the time step is also small, that will reduce the amount of heat and keep the temperature from becoming artificially large.
-
April 9, 2024 at 1:00 amweiSubscriber
Thanks for your reply.Â
May I ask is there a rule of thumb for setting the time step in modeling? For example, in a CFD world, there is Courant Number to follow?
Also, I am not sure if it is still the time step problem which led to some negative temperature in the first couple dozen steps.
Thank you.
-
April 16, 2024 at 9:06 pmweiSubscriber
Hi Dave,
I tried to alter the time step size, however I found there was almost no effect on the max surface temperature.
Â
-
-
April 9, 2024 at 2:44 pmdloomanAnsys Employee
Yes, there is also the problem of too small a time step with higher order elements (producing temperature undershoot.) You might consider using linear, lower order, elements to avoid that issue. I don't know a rule of thumb for setting the time step to capture the correct thermal shock surface temperature. You could determine it experimentally with a test model.
-
April 9, 2024 at 9:41 pmweiSubscriber
Hi Dave,
I tried liner order elements and the negative temperature gone! Thank you so much for that.
I would like to understand more about this temperature undershoot issue. Could you please provide me with some materials to help me understand it better?
Thank you!
-
-
April 10, 2024 at 2:40 pmdloomanAnsys Employee
See Section 3.4.3.2 of the Thermal Analysis Guide. It's not really an explanation, but it's all we have.
-
April 14, 2024 at 8:39 pmweiSubscriber
Excuse me where to find "Thermal Analysis Guide"? Thank you
-
-
April 17, 2024 at 2:40 pm
-
- The topic ‘Moving heat flux issue in ANSYS transient thermal’ is closed to new replies.
- Problem with access to session files
- Ayuda con Error: “Unable to access the source: EngineeringData”
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Error when opening saved Workbench project
- Geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements
- How to apply Compression-only Support?
- How to select the interface delamination surface of a laminate?
- Timestep range set for animation export
- Image to file in Mechanical is bugged and does not show text
- SMART crack under fatigue conditions, different crack sizes can’t growth
-
1216
-
543
-
523
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.