TAGGED: chassis, modal-analysis, natural-frequency, vibration
-
-
December 31, 2020 at 11:40 am
Vishalyadav08
SubscriberI am trying to perform Modal Analysis on a two-wheeler frame structure assembly. The assembly earlier had penetration and gaps. I have attached different components via bonded type contact and tried to adjust the closure of contact via pinball radius and eliminated penetrations by editing geometry via Spaceclaim. The geometry now only has gaps (which I cannot eliminate). While running the Modal Analysis for un-constrained geometry, I am getting first three natural frequencies as zero but 4th to 6th as non-zero values. Also, the first six mode shapes are normal (first three displacements and the later three as rotation about the three axis). What should I do to make all six natural frequencies as zeron -
December 31, 2020 at 12:34 pm
Aniket
Forum ModeratorHave you applied any boundary condition except bonded contact? Are the nonzero frequencies near zero?n-AniketnHow to access Ansys help linksnGuidelines for Posting on Ansys Learning Forumn -
December 31, 2020 at 12:49 pm
Vishalyadav08
SubscriberNo I have not applied any other boundary condition. And the non zero frequencies are between 20 to 40 Hz.n -
January 1, 2021 at 10:53 am
BenjaminStarling
SubscribernThis is a known issue/limitation with penalty based contacts and rotational modes. It occurs when the two surface contacting are not parallel/normal to each other. To fix this you can change the formulation to MPC, or try and control the mesh such that all surfaces have equal elements that are normal for each pair of elements.nUnfortunately there currently is no other solution, and sometimes MPC contact is not an acceptable formulation, which means you can be stuck with defeaturing your model to ensure the contact faces are normal to each other. n -
January 6, 2021 at 10:37 am
Vishalyadav08
SubscriberHi ArraynI'm trying both MPC and Beam Formulation for whole assembly. Before that I've tried both MPC and beam formulation for a simplified version of assembly (having only few components) just for checking the contact. Both formulations are working and showing similar trend in natural frequencies. For the whole chassis however, beam formulation is converging and giving result. MPC formulation is unable to converge and showing an unknown error. I think this is happening because of improper selection of contact and target bodies.n
-
Viewing 4 reply threads
- The topic ‘Modal analysis non-zero natural frequency result for un-constrained geometry.’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation Space
Trending discussions
- The legend values are not changing.
- LPBF Simulation of dissimilar materials in ANSYS mechanical (Thermal Transient)
- Convergence error in modal analysis
- APDL, memory, solid
- How to model a bimodular material in Mechanical
- Meaning of the error
- Simulate a fan on the end of shaft
- Nonlinear load cases combinations
- Real Life Example of a non-symmetric eigenvalue problem
- How can the results of Pressures and Motions for all elements be obtained?
Top Contributors
-
3892
-
1414
-
1241
-
1118
-
1015
Top Rated Tags
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.