-
-
September 24, 2024 at 3:55 pmcgutie22Subscriber
To whom it may concern,
I have been scripting various FDTD simulations with a plane wave propogating in the -z direction, and have some monitors nearby. Â I did not script an explicit value for the electric field. Looking online, it seems that the magnitude of the electric field is 1 V/m by default. However, when pulling E_x and E_y from power monitors, I find that <|E_x|> and <|E_y|> can be greater than 1. For clarity, <|E_x|> refers to the average of the absolute value of E_x through the monitor.
1) Isn't |E|=sqrt((abs|E_x|^2)+(abs|E_y|^2)+(abs|E_z|^2)) ? If so, why does the monitor read a value greater than 1?
2) Why does this happen?
I am willing to dm files upon request.
-
September 25, 2024 at 5:28 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
I do not see any description about what material/device you are testing. Please visualize the source amplitude. In many cases the local intensity can be larger than the source intensity, due to refraction, diffraction, scattering and interference. even for one material half in air, the intensity can be larger than the source since 1+r=t from the Fresnel coefficient.
In addition, please check if the boundary condition is correct: for plane wave, periodic boundary condition should be used.Â
https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/360034382874-Understanding-field-truncation-issues-with-finite-sized-plane-wave-sources
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- Difference between answers in version 2024 and 2017 lumerical mode solution
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- Import material .txt file with script
- Trapezoidal ring
- Help for qINTERCONNECT
- Issues with getting result from interconnent analysis script
- Topology Optimization Error
- Edge Coupler EME Example Issue
- The two modes overlap the integral
-
1191
-
513
-
488
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.