-
-
October 25, 2024 at 9:07 am512105003Subscriber
Hi,
I have conducted an analysis of my waveguide design using the Mode Solver to achieve a single mode operation, and the results are attached. According to the results, the effective index of Mode 1 is calculated as 1.605514, with TE/TM polarization fractions of 82.1% and 83.17%, respectively. Mode 2, on the other hand, has reached cutoff and does not propagate. I am uncertain about the correct naming for Mode 1—would it be appropriate to label this mode as TM00? Could you please clarify the correct mode designation? Additionally, I would appreciate any explanation regarding the TE polarization fraction and the waveguide TE/TM fraction.
-
October 25, 2024 at 10:31 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
Somehow my reply was not successul so I reply it again:
TE/TM naming is not unique. and due to different conventions and approximations, the definition can be controvvesal. Silicon photonics or other high-index-contrast waveguides have tight mode confiement. so strict deinition can be challenge. You can define the mode by your self.
Please visit this post
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- Difference between answers in version 2024 and 2017 lumerical mode solution
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- Import material .txt file with script
- Help for qINTERCONNECT
- Trapezoidal ring
- Issues with getting result from interconnent analysis script
- How to measure transmission coefficients on a given plane .
- Topology Optimization Error
- Absorption cross-section of AuNR excited by prism-based TIR
-
1301
-
591
-
544
-
524
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.