-
-
October 14, 2024 at 3:03 am3343534645Subscriber
I derived Cook's theory and also rewrote Borst's theory. When they introduced the calculation formula for the geometric stiffness matrix of solid elements, the matrix had zero elements. Why is the geometric stiffness matrix output by ANSYS APDL entirely composed of non-zero elements? Was the calculation incorrect?
-
October 14, 2024 at 3:12 am3343534645Subscriber
Thank you to all the experts for reviewing and replying! I am very interested in this issue.
-
October 15, 2024 at 8:54 am3343534645Subscriber
Why haven't any ANSYS staff responded to me? Recently, I also tried Němec's theory (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). However, the geometric stiffness matrix calculated from the theoretical formulas still doesn't match the one in ANSYS APDL. What could be the reason for this? I sincerely hope that someone knowledgeable can resolve this long-standing confusion for me.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Error when opening saved Workbench project
- How to apply Compression-only Support?
- Geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements
- Frictional No separation contact
- Timestep range set for animation export
- Script Error Code:800a000d
- Image to file in Mechanical is bugged and does not show text
- Elastic limit load, Elastic-plastic limit load
- Element has excessive thickness change, distortion, is turning inside out
-
1436
-
599
-
591
-
591
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.