-
-
October 14, 2024 at 2:47 am
3343534645
SubscriberI derived Cook's theory and also rewrote Borst's theory. When they introduced the calculation formula for the geometric stiffness matrix of solid elements, the geometric stiffness matrix they computed had non-zero elements. Why is the geometric stiffness matrix output by ANSYS APDL entirely composed of non-zero elements? Was the calculation incorrect?
-
October 14, 2024 at 2:50 am
3343534645
SubscriberI derived Cook's theory and also rewrote Borst's theory. When they introduced the calculation formula for the geometric stiffness matrix of solid elements, the matrix had zero elements. Why is the geometric stiffness matrix output by ANSYS APDL entirely composed of non-zero elements? Was the calculation incorrect?
-
October 14, 2024 at 8:49 am
harshvardhan.negi
Ansys EmployeeHi,
It seems that you have posted another thread with same question. Since this is a duplicate thread, I will be closing this discussion. Other discussion can be found in this link:
Is ANSYS APDL’s geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements wrong?
Regards,
Harshvardhan
-
- The topic ‘Is ANSYS APDL’s geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements wrong?’ is closed to new replies.
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Script Error Code:800a000d
- Element has excessive thickness change, distortion, is turning inside out
- Elastic limit load, Elastic-plastic limit load
- Image to file in Mechanical is bugged and does not show text
- Help to do quasistatic analysis in static structural module
-
1932
-
823
-
599
-
591
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.