-
-
October 14, 2024 at 2:47 am
3343534645
SubscriberI derived Cook's theory and also rewrote Borst's theory. When they introduced the calculation formula for the geometric stiffness matrix of solid elements, the geometric stiffness matrix they computed had non-zero elements. Why is the geometric stiffness matrix output by ANSYS APDL entirely composed of non-zero elements? Was the calculation incorrect?
-
October 14, 2024 at 2:50 am
3343534645
SubscriberI derived Cook's theory and also rewrote Borst's theory. When they introduced the calculation formula for the geometric stiffness matrix of solid elements, the matrix had zero elements. Why is the geometric stiffness matrix output by ANSYS APDL entirely composed of non-zero elements? Was the calculation incorrect?
-
October 14, 2024 at 8:49 am
Harshvardhan
Ansys EmployeeHi,
It seems that you have posted another thread with same question. Since this is a duplicate thread, I will be closing this discussion. Other discussion can be found in this link:
Is ANSYS APDL’s geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements wrong?
Regards,
Harshvardhan
-
- The topic ‘Is ANSYS APDL’s geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements wrong?’ is closed to new replies.
- The legend values are not changing.
- LPBF Simulation of dissimilar materials in ANSYS mechanical (Thermal Transient)
- Convergence error in modal analysis
- APDL, memory, solid
- How to model a bimodular material in Mechanical
- Meaning of the error
- Simulate a fan on the end of shaft
- Nonlinear load cases combinations
- Real Life Example of a non-symmetric eigenvalue problem
- How can the results of Pressures and Motions for all elements be obtained?
-
3862
-
1414
-
1231
-
1118
-
1015
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.