-
-
October 14, 2024 at 2:47 am3343534645Subscriber
I derived Cook's theory and also rewrote Borst's theory. When they introduced the calculation formula for the geometric stiffness matrix of solid elements, the geometric stiffness matrix they computed had non-zero elements. Why is the geometric stiffness matrix output by ANSYS APDL entirely composed of non-zero elements? Was the calculation incorrect?
-
October 14, 2024 at 2:50 am3343534645Subscriber
I derived Cook's theory and also rewrote Borst's theory. When they introduced the calculation formula for the geometric stiffness matrix of solid elements, the matrix had zero elements. Why is the geometric stiffness matrix output by ANSYS APDL entirely composed of non-zero elements? Was the calculation incorrect?
-
October 14, 2024 at 8:49 amHarshvardhanAnsys Employee
Hi,
It seems that you have posted another thread with same question. Since this is a duplicate thread, I will be closing this discussion. Other discussion can be found in this link:
Is ANSYS APDL’s geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements wrong?
Regards,
Harshvardhan
-
- The topic ‘Is ANSYS APDL’s geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements wrong?’ is closed to new replies.
- Ayuda con Error: “Unable to access the source: EngineeringData”
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Error when opening saved Workbench project
- How to apply Compression-only Support?
- Geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements
- How to select the interface delamination surface of a laminate?
- Timestep range set for animation export
- Image to file in Mechanical is bugged and does not show text
- Frictional No separation contact
- Elastic limit load, Elastic-plastic limit load
-
1301
-
591
-
544
-
524
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.