We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
Photonics

Photonics

Topics related to Lumerical and more.

Inquiry about CHARGE settings

    • 2382923580
      Subscriber

      Now I have imported the. mat file generated by solar_generation in FDTD into CHARGE. May I ask what settings are needed for the CHARGE model? My current problem is that the initialization failed to converge, but after reading the official manual, it was not resolved. It may be a setting issue. Besides the ones in the figure, what other settings do I need to add or modify to the model.

    • Amrita Pati
      Ansys Employee

      Hi,

      Convergence issues can be caused due to several reasons like the mesh, material models, and so on. It might be a bit challenging for me to identify the root cause without having a look at the simulation file.
      My first question would be, are you able to get past the initialization stage with the "generation" object disabled/under dark conditions? Can you send a screesshot of the mesh/grid after the meshing stage? Also, are you using any advanced material models like high-field mobility/impact ionization?

      My recommendation would be to simplfy the simulation, such as disabling the surface recombination boundary conditions, the optical generation rate, turning off any advanced material models. With these disabled, check if you are able to solve the convergence issue. Then you can enable these models/parameters one by one and narrow down on which input parameter is causing the convergcne error and then we will discuss how to address the error.

      Regards,
      Amrita

      • 2382923580
        Subscriber

         

         

        I cannot get past the initialization stage with the “generation” object disabled,I don’t use any advanced material models like high-field mobility/impact ionization.Thank you for your reply.In addition, I have reviewed all official cases that have used this import method,such as https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/360042160334-Thin-film-GaAs-solar-cell,3D pillar silicon solar cell,Silicon solar cell with TiO2 pyramid array and so on, but still have not learned the settings that I missed.If it is convenient, could you please let me know your email address so that I can send you the model?This is very important to me.

         

         

         

    • Amrita Pati
      Ansys Employee

      Hi,

      Then I would recommend trying to resolve the convergence error without the generation object first. Also, are you able to get convergence for a 2D slice? In general, it is harder to attain convergence in 3D simulations so it is best to go into the final simulation after we can get the simpler configurations to converge.

      The mesh screenshot doesn't give any useful information. I believe it is because we are seeing the exterior surface and the fetaures are on the interior. Also, I would recommend visualizing the mesh with the "Show" "surface and mesh" option:

      It can tell you if each feature is being properly resolved (or too resolved) or not. Are you starting the voltage sweep at 0V? Are you using any mesh override? What is the overall simulation size and what is the mesh size? What is the thinnest layer?

      Unfortunately, we are not allowed to share our email address on a public forum or exchange files. Would you be able to share an official email address (like university) email with us?

      Regards,
      Amrita

      • 2382923580
        Subscriber

         

        Hi,this time I use 2D simulation,but Drift-diffusion/Poisson Newton solver failed to converge after 100 iterations.
Device solution update error ratio norm is 1.32431e+59
Device residual norm is 2.9635e+08.
Residual ratio (last iteration/first iteration) is 37358.5.
JRPTFRC9(process 0): Warning: The charge transport solver failed to converge (Convergence Failure).

         

    • 2382923580
      Subscriber

       

       

       

      Dear sir,

      I appreciate your response; however, as I am currently in China, the time difference limits our working hours, which causes a conflict. This has resulted in my slow response after reviewing your solution, making it difficult to efficiently resolve this issue within the limited time frame. I am eager to resolve such problems.If possible, I can provide this for a fee.Or,you can give me some ways to get paid guidance.It would be better if they are some technicians from the Chinese region.Best wishes!

      Additionally, my univers email is 2109030114@s.upc.edu.cn.
       

       

       

       

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.