TAGGED: 3d-meshing, peteroznewman, peteroznewmen, porous-model
-
-
May 13, 2025 at 6:58 am
nitkum221
SubscriberDear Peteroznewman Sir,
This is a continuation of the previous thread: https://innovationspace.ansys.com/forum/forums/topic/improving-mesh-at-thin-area/
Sir, I haven’t received a response from you regarding my next question, so I’m posting it here again.
I am working on both structural and fluidic analysis for this model, but I am currently focusing on the structural part. For this, I am applying a 100 N load on the superior surface of the plate, while the inferior surface is fixed, in order to analyze the implant body.
I have attached two actual models for your reference. The small part (design 7) previously shared for analysis is from Implant-1. I have now generated a new model without the thin connecting area; however, I am still unable to mesh either model using your suggested method.Â
Please note that we have designed a porous scaffold where the holes serve as pores within the solid structure. Because of this, we cannot modify the shape or dimensions of the model—we need to preserve the original geometry.
If possible, I kindly request your assistance in successfully meshing both models.
Implant 1 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SHLlabR0wDjmDy_9OlGfO19xHNCCkD6N/view?usp=sharing
Implant 2 - https://drive.google.com/file/d/19BDfjoZ0iFvJ7WzAU8XH5m0HhcHutes8/view?usp=sharing
Thank you in advance sir
-
May 15, 2025 at 10:48 am
Ashish Khemka
Forum ModeratorHello,
Ansys employees cannot look into the model. Please wait for Peter/ other forum members to comment.
Regards,
Ashish Khemka
Â
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
3139
-
1007
-
918
-
858
-
792
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.