-
-
September 19, 2023 at 11:52 amJi-Hyun JeonSubscriberI did a crash simulation in Explicit and saw the difference in results based on Failure properties.1. What is the difference in the physical properties of Tense pressure failure so that the crack seems to have progressed?
-
September 21, 2023 at 5:48 pmChris QuanAnsys Employee
Explicit Dynamics system uses Autodyn solver. In Autodyn, stresses tensor is the sum of hydrostatic stress or volumetric stress plus deviatoric stress.
Principal stress failure is calculated from the deviatoric stress tensor while tensile pressure failure is calculated from the hydrostatic stress tensor.
Shell elements do not have volume. Thus hydrostatic stress is not available. That's why Tensile Pressure Failure is not available to shell elements.
If shell elements must be used, you may consider to add Stochasetic Failure to the Principal Stress Failure. Stochastic Failure will randomize the failure parameters from element to element. Each element could have different failure parameter (for example, maximum principal stress), with the 50% possibility on the nominal value defined in Principal Stress Failure. See the picture below.
This will help you to create more realistic crack pattern from simulations.
-
September 22, 2023 at 11:27 amJi-Hyun JeonSubscriber
Hello.
Do I usually use the same value for the Stochastic Failure model?
Thank you for your resply.
-
-
- The topic ‘I’d like to see a full crack if I put enough force on a part of the thin film.’ is closed to new replies.
- How to apply Compression-only Support?
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Error when opening saved Workbench project
- Script Error Code:800a000d
- Elastic limit load, Elastic-plastic limit load
- Image to file in Mechanical is bugged and does not show text
- Element has excessive thickness change, distortion, is turning inside out
-
1762
-
635
-
599
-
591
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.