Electronics

Electronics

Topics related to HFSS, Maxwell, SIwave, Icepak, Electronics Enterprise and more.

IcePak Monitor Returning NaN Value

TAGGED: 

    • weilun.ang
      Subscriber

      Hi guys, 

      I am currently running some simulations in AEDT Icepak to determine how good the heat transfer is of a MOSFET into the PCB. For this I have setup a few monitors, one of them is on the top case, and one of them is on the bottom face (face between MOSFET and PCB). When I view the results, the monitor on the bottom face is returning a NaN value. What is the issue here?

      Thanks in advance!

       

    • Iceman
      Ansys Employee
      Is the MOSFET modeled as network? If so, the monitor might have been put inside the network object due to numerical rounding error. Since Solve Inside is unchecked for network objects, there won't value for monitor. Please shift the monitor point slightly downward, then you should see result. Thanks.
    • weilun.ang
      Subscriber

      It is currently only being modeled as a block thermal and not a network, but I will double check if the solve inside is enabled. Is there anything else that might be causing this issue?

      • Iceman
        Ansys Employee

        If there is mesh where the monitor is located, there should be results. Please check the mesh. Thanks.

        • weilun.ang
          Subscriber


          I reran the meshing and simulation with 2 monitors on the same face, Face380_1 is a point monitor where as Face380 is a surface monitor. Could you maybe shed some light on why the surface monitor returns a NaN?

        • Iceman
          Ansys Employee

          Please check the object priority of MOSFET and PCB. If the surface monitor is assigned on the face of object with lower priority, there won't be results as the mesh will belong to the object with higher priority in overlapped region. Please use mesh viewer to check the mesh on the face with surface monitor assignment. If this is the issue, please make the MOSFET priority higher than that of PCB. Thanks.

        • weilun.ang
          Subscriber

          The meshing  priority was the issue. Thanks!

        • Iceman
          Ansys Employee

          You are welcome

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.