TAGGED: ansys-fluent, do-radiation-model, solar-load
-
-
September 28, 2020 at 6:35 am
arpatil_31
SubscriberHello Everyone,
I am conducting solar radiation simulation for concrete road 0.2m thickness and concrete wall of 5 m height and 20 m length but getting un-realistic results. The details of the fluent boundary condition settings are as follows:
Radiation Model- DO
Solar Ray Tracing: Solar calculator- I have defined altitude, longitude, time zone, day, month, time, East-North mesh direction.
Direct Solar Irradiation- 1040 w/m2, Diffuse Solar Irradiation- 95 w/m2, Spectral Fraction- 0.5
Concrete material properties:
Density:Â 2000 Kg/m3
Sp. Heat:Â 960 J/kg.K
Thermal Conductivity: 1.5 W/m.K
Absorption Coefficient: 1.7 1/m
Scattering Coefficient: 0 1/m
Refractive Index: 0
Air material properties:
Density:Â ideal gas
Sp. Heat:Â 1006.43 J/kg.K
Thermal Conductivity: 0.0242 W/m.K
Absorption Coefficient: 0 1/m
Scattering Coefficient: 0 1/m
Refractive Index: 0
Concrete road and wall boundary conditions:
Thermal condition- coupled, Emissivity- 0.9, Material- concrete
Radiation BC type- Opaque, Diffuse fraction- 1, Solar BC- participate in solar ray tracing,
Absorptivity: Direct Visible- 0.6 and Direct IR-0.6
Inlet BC: 1m/s, 42C temp., default radiation tab settings
Outlet BC: pressure outlet, default radiation tab settings
Using this setting, I am getting wall temperature more than 90 Deg. C. Also, radiation temperature is high.
Moreover, I kept different settings but still results are wrong.
Kindly help me in solving the problem.
Thanks in advance.
September 28, 2020 at 10:27 amRob
Forum ModeratorI'd use incompressible ideal gas as it'll be more stable. I'd also review the refractive index of air: why did you set it as zero?nOctober 2, 2020 at 6:53 amarpatil_31
SubscriberDear Rob,nThanks for reply. Mistakenly, I wrote 0 value for refractive index of air. I have used default 1 value. I kept density of air as in-compressible ideal gas but still temperature of concrete wall and road is near to 140 Deg. C. nMoreover, Wall boundary condition has created shadow walls and I have un-ticked the option of participate in solar ray tracing. Is it correct method or do I need to keep participate in solar ray tracing for shadow walls?nAfter Initialization, following message appears at text user interface:nInternally scattered energy: 1.75e+06 [w],nAmbient flux: 316 [w/m2]nTotal integral energy source: 4.2e+06 [w] {which is sum of integral energy of all boundary}nThough we used Direct Solar Irradiation- 1040 w/m2 and Diffuse Solar Irradiation- 95 w/m2. Why these values are very high?nThanks.nOctober 8, 2020 at 7:00 amarpatil_31
SubscriberPlease help me in solving my problem.nThanksnViewing 3 reply threads- The topic ‘How to conduct solar radiation simulation in Ansys Fluent?’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussions- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
Top Contributors-
3862
-
1414
-
1220
-
1118
-
1015
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-