We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
Electronics

Electronics

Topics related to HFSS, Maxwell, SIwave, Icepak, Electronics Enterprise and more.

HFSS de-embedding Ports

    • samihawasli
      Subscriber

      Hello all,

      I dont think I fully understand what HFSS does when you deembed a waveport into a simulation. In my understanding, deembedding is simply moving the refence plane of the simulation further into the model by some distance, effectively ignoring any interactions or reflections prior to the deembedding distance. Perhaps someone can help me to understand where I am mistaken. 

      To test my understanding and give something to discuss I made a very basic simulation. On the top left is a picture of the simulation. A single microstrip line within a vacuum box, that is terminated with a 25Ohm RLC boundary. The waveport is set not to re-normalize the data to ignore any mismatches at the port. On the top right is a top view of the simulation. The ustrip line is separated into two pieces of metal. For one simulation, the ustrip line is all gold, for a second simulation the input tap of metal is changed to stainless steel (something with low conductivity). In both simulations I set the port to deembed past the input tab by twice the tab's lenght. To make sure I am comparing apples to apples, both simulations share the exact same mesh and have the same number of meshing elements. The convergence looked ok, and i would expect HFSS to do well on such a simple strucutre. My inital notion of deembeeding would lead me to think the results should be indetical since I am deembdding past the discontinty in the metal line.

      However, as the plot on the left shows, the results are different despite deembedding. Just as a sanity check, the the plot on the right compares the sims with all the ustip lines being gold and the results being almost identical (although i still wouldn't have expected the little blip either). This is a confusing results given my previous, incorrect view of what deembedding is doing. Does anyone have any thoughts?

      Happy to provide more context on the problem if people need, Thanks!

    • Takeshi Itadani
      Ansys Employee

      The Wave Port Deembed function is calculated based on the Complex Propagation Constant at the port surface of the Wave Port. The process adjusts the calculated position of the S-parameter from the Complex Propagation Constant; it is an absolute condition that the state (shape, material) of the cross-section of the Wave Port does not change depending on the position of Deembed. Therefore, it cannot be used if the state of the cross-section (shape, material in contact, etc.) of the Wave Port changes depending on the position of Deembed.
      Please use ACSS support if you want to check the details.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.