-
-
July 5, 2024 at 3:43 amguangbin zhangSubscriber
尊敬的老师: 最近我在用公式验证MODE EXPANSION中的P和N;我 查得信息得 Nm = 0.5. ∗ R Em × H∗ m · dS P in = 0.5. ∗ R Ein × H∗ m · dS 那么我化简得到 Nm = 0.5. ∗ dx. ∗ dy P (Exm ∗ Hym∗ − Eym ∗ Hxm∗ ) Pm = 0.5. ∗ dx. ∗ dy P (Exin ∗ Hyin∗ − Eyin ∗ Hxin∗ ) FDTD代码如下 selectall; delete; um=10^(-6); addrect; set('x',0); set('x span',0.22*um); set('y',0); set('y span',0.5*um); set('z min',-3*um); set('z max',10*um); set('material','
Nm=4.3394e-16+1.4132e-29i;Pm=4.3393e-16-1.6214e-18i.
Nm1=1.0921e-16;Pin1=1.0848e-16+4.0534e-19i;
我注意到公式计算和仿真得到的有一个4倍关系,但我仍然不清楚到底为什么结果不一样。
-
July 5, 2024 at 6:35 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
你用的Sum? 应该用积分 https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/360034405814-integrate-Script-command 你试一下。
-
August 6, 2024 at 7:59 amjenningslebsackSubscriber
-
August 8, 2024 at 11:48 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/360034405814-integrate-Script-command This link works fine from my end. Please check your internet link.
-
- The topic ‘关于通过公式得到的P和N与MODE EXPANSION得到的结果不一致的问题’ is closed to new replies.
-
1191
-
513
-
488
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.