-
-
July 19, 2023 at 5:10 am
mertturgut.senol
SubscriberDear All Experts;
I am trying to make a structural analysis.
There are reinforcements on the surface of a tank.
I modelled the tank with midsurface. But I modelled the reinforcement on the surface of tank as 3D.
when I connected the reinforcement to the tank I used bonded contact and MPC formulation.
There is gab between tank surface and 3D model. this gab is due to the thickness of the tank plate. I enclosed a photo showing this gab. I used pinball radius.
contact initial information is like that;
Â
there are some forces acting to the surface of reinforcement and I am trying to find out the deformation on the tank surface.
I wonder that, this gab may affect my result?
all comments and suggestioın will be appreciated.
best regards.
-
July 19, 2023 at 9:57 am
Aniket
Forum Moderator-
July 19, 2023 at 12:39 pm
-
-
July 19, 2023 at 1:09 pm
Aniket
Forum Moderator -
July 19, 2023 at 1:17 pm
mertturgut.senol
SubscriberOk yes I solved this problem by viewing error message like you showed.
I adjusted midsurface offset type to the top, it should be middle.
when I changed offset type to the middle it is ok.
-
July 19, 2023 at 2:06 pm
Aniket
Forum ModeratorGreat, just make sure the shells are where they should be by turning on Thick shells and beams and show mesh in display ribbon tab.
-Aniket
-
-
July 21, 2023 at 7:41 am
mertturgut.senol
SubscriberDr. Mr. aniket;
Â
thank you for your valuable suggestion.
-
- The topic ‘GAP between midsurface and 3D part’ is closed to new replies.
-
2557
-
933
-
792
-
599
-
591
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.