General Mechanical

General Mechanical

Topics related to Mechanical Enterprise, Motion, Additive Print and more.

Force application in harmonic response simulation for different speeds

    • Nikunj Panchal
      Subscriber

      Hello all,

      I have the measurement data for Operational Vibration measurement for rotor running at different speeds e.g. 5000 rad/s, 10000 rad/s etc. and I want compare that to the simulation. 

       

      In the simulation I am using remote force to generate the Imbalance in the rotor and applying that for different frequencies. 

       

      Now I want to make sure that the force that is being applied in the simulation is for the speed of 5000 rad/s. 

       

      And I want the simulation to run for the range of 2000 to 10000(Because the measurement data that I have is for this range), which i can change in the Analysis settings by changing the range. I have already seen the documentation regarding this, there was a method using synchro command and also using the frequency sweep via variational technology Method, but I don’t think that really helps me in this situation and it doesn’t really clarify the doubt that I have.

       

      Now the doubt that I have is

       

      (1) I want to run the simulation between the range of 2000 to 10000 so I will have to provide the data for the force generated between this range, but the force that I want to apply is for a constant speed. So if I apply a different force for different frequencies that will increase the amplitude of force as well resulting in the increase of deformation amplitude. 

       

      So do I have to apply the same force for the whole frequency range? Or just apply the force at that specific frequency?

    • Rahul Kumbhar
      Ansys Employee

      Hi Nikunj,

      You should be able to define different force at different frequency. There is option to define force as tabular loading. 

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • The topic ‘Force application in harmonic response simulation for different speeds’ is closed to new replies.