TAGGED: aerodynamics, designmodeler, fluent, pressure-drop, radiator
-
-
December 19, 2020 at 10:39 pm
ManuelSoler
SubscriberHello,
I am having issues when dealing with porous jumps across a radiator in a duct. My issue is that I am not able to select my radiator and fan faces as an internal boundary condition. I have tried the following:
-Create an enclosure through DM with both the duct and the radiator (naming the face "radiator") and volume meshing all
-Create an enclosure of the duct and deal with the radiator as a fluid (naming the face "radiator") and volume meshing separately my radiator and enclosure
-Create an enclosure of the duct and transforming the radiator to surfaces and volume meshing separately radiator and enclosure
See attached images.
Thanks for your help
December 22, 2020 at 9:48 pmRK
Ansys EmployeeHello, nThis can be done in Fluent meshing while selecting boundaries. It is easier while using the water tight workflow. In the boundaries tab, just choose the fluid domain to internal. nDecember 22, 2020 at 9:53 pmManuelSoler
SubscriberThanks Rahkumar.nUsing the watertight workflow usually ends with free faces on my mesh due to the complex geometry. Regarding the fluid domain to change into internal, are you referring to the enclosure or to my component?nAlso, I would appreciate on which of the geometry methods I attempted would work betternDecember 28, 2020 at 10:57 amManuelSoler
SubscriberHello, This can be done in Fluent meshing while selecting boundaries. It is easier while using the water tight workflow. In the boundaries tab, just choose the fluid domain to internal./forum/discussion/comment/101041#Comment_101041
Thanks Rahkumar.nUsing the watertight workflow usually ends unsuccessfully when generating my surface mesh due to the complex geometry, do you know how to solve this issue?. Adding to it, I used the same local sizing which worked (after exporting the sizefield and re-importing the geometry with a surface mesh). nIs there a way to achieve the same without using the workflow?nAlso, I would appreciate on which of the geometry methods I attempted would work better as I have tried different combinations using designmodeler and spaceclaimnDecember 29, 2020 at 7:57 pmManuelSoler
Subscriberhello,nI finally was able to solve my issue, if any of you are struggling with the same send me a message.nDecember 30, 2020 at 1:41 pmKarthik Remella
AdministratorGlad that you were able to resolve it. If you could post the fix, it will help the members on the forum.nThank you.nKarthiknDecember 30, 2020 at 4:15 pmManuelSoler
SubscriberIn order for fluent to detect it, create the enclosure of all components and make sure they are seaparated from the duct walls, otherwise it would be detected as a wallnViewing 6 reply threads- The topic ‘Fluent-DesignModeler: help in simulating a radiator (porous zone) in a duct’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussions- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
Top Contributors-
3862
-
1414
-
1221
-
1118
-
1015
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-