-
-
October 13, 2021 at 1:09 pmvsjay3Subscriber
Hi all,
So I am modelling a simple heat exchange design using Ansys Fluent but have a small doubt that I believe you could clarify for me. The design is provided below. A U-shaped pipe is embedded inside a sand layer and water is flowing inside the pipe. The pipe flow is horizontal and the sand is being heated from the top. So the heat is flowing vertically through the sand layer and heating the sand layer. Meanwhile, cold water is pumped into the pipe (from an external pump) and is flowing horizontally inside the pipe (turbulent flow conditions) while the heat from the warm sand layer will transfer to the flowing water through the pipe wall.
October 14, 2021 at 1:21 pmKarthik RemellaAdministratorHello You will need to first determine if the heat transfer is natural or forced. Estimating the Rayleigh number might help. Once you confirm that natural convection in important to understand the heat transfer, you will need to include the gravitational terms in your equations. Otherwise, it may not be necessary.
Karthik
October 14, 2021 at 4:06 pmvsjay3Subscriber
Thank you so much for replying. Appreciate it. I can calculate the Richardson number and see if natural convection is dominant or not. I understand that gravity option needs to be enabled when natural convection (or buoyancy effects) are dominant in the flow.
But keeping the natural convection aside for now - does activating the gravity option have anything to do with the flow direction as well? For example, assuming hypothetically that I have a vertical pipe flow and it is under purely forced convection conditions (zero natural convection) - do I still need to include the gravity option just because the flow is in the vertical direction? Or does the direction of flow not matter (and does not need to be considered) when enabling the gravity option? Until now I thought even if natural convection is not present in the flow, we should still enable the gravity option if the flow direction is non-horizontal (i.e., either vertical or at an angle) (I thought this because in normal physics, we take into account the gravity force when we analyze forces in vertical direction or at angles)
Your kind response would be highly appreciated!
Thank you!
October 14, 2021 at 4:10 pmvsjay3Subscriber
October 14, 2021 at 8:57 pmKarthik RemellaAdministratorHello The gravitational term might be important in your question from a momentum balance standpoint. You might want to compare the inertia and viscous forces with the gravitational terms. If you wish to accurately capture all the forces acting on the fluid, I would include it in your analysis. If it turns out that including this term is not impacting your heat transfer, then the influence of the gravitational term is indeed weak.
Karthik
October 19, 2021 at 7:39 amOctober 19, 2021 at 10:45 amRobForum ModeratorIt's tagging the same value in the solver, we have 2-3 ways of setting some values due to the way the code has evolved over the years. Do not turn gravity on and set as zero, it's a waste of solver resource and may not improve stability.
March 17, 2023 at 5:40 amArun KumarSubscriberHi,
My problem is almost similar to above can you please share boundary condition to be used. I want to know temperature distribution in pipe to check thermal expension of pipe.
Viewing 7 reply threads- The topic ‘Enabling gravitational acceleration option in horizontal pipe flow-heat transfer’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussions- How do I get my hands on Ansys Rocky DEM
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Facing trouble regarding setting up boundary conditions for SOEC Modeling
- Script Error
- convergence issue for transonic flow
Top Contributors-
1727
-
630
-
599
-
591
-
366
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-