We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Doubt related to improving the mesh quality for shell and tube heat exchanger

    • Ashen Perera
      Subscriber

      Hi ,

      I am doing my final year engineering project on the modelling of a shell and tube heat exchanger , I modelled the heat exchanger and I have meshed it in Ansys mesh. I have a few doubts to clear up as follows: 

      I would like to improve my mesh quality i have applied sizing methods on edges , faces of tubes and shells. I have shown the final quality metrics but I want to further improve such as in the points i have shown.

      - the mesh i used is tetrahedrons with the element size currently set at 3mm : 

      1. I want to improve the mesh metrics further by reducing the maximum skewness value, a few elements are at 0.86 ( i have attached mesh metrics , skewness plot and the elements that have the high skewness )
      2. Doubt about the interfaces, in the fluent interface i see src and trg in interfaces , when i unselect the tube walls disappear , I would like to know about this but the walls dont display ( should i make these src and trg interfaces coupled as my heat transfer is from the tube surface to the shell side) 
      3. I would like to know about if i need to apply inflation to the tubes . 

      Thanks in advance ,

      Ashen

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      Couple of general comments. 

      • Why have you modelled the baffles with a thickness? Have a look at the thin wall options in Fluent
      • Try and avoid non conformal interfaces, so check multibody parts or share topology options (DesignModeler & SpaceClaim respectively)
    • Ashen Perera
      Subscriber

      But i need the baffle thickness to be 4 mm , and if i coupled the src and trg would it be fine 

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      Read the section in Fluent relating to thin (coupled) walls. Setting a nonconformal is OK, but a conformal mesh may be computationally more efficient. 

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Doubt related to improving the mesh quality for shell and tube heat exchanger’ is closed to new replies.