-
-
February 4, 2022 at 1:43 amejlee0911Subscriber
Hello. I simulated the Fabry-Perot cavity in which a dipole source exists. To get transmission results, Trans_box ( considering only +z flux) and 2D Z normal monitor were used.
February 4, 2022 at 2:19 amejlee0911Subscriber.
February 4, 2022 at 3:21 amejlee0911SubscriberMonitor located at the top in total simulation is the monitor where I got the "sourcepower/dipolepower".
Using the transmission box surrounded dipole source, I wonder if it's the right way to get the sourcepower through the monitor at the top and calculate dipolepower.
I look forward to your reply. Thank you.
February 4, 2022 at 5:33 amejlee0911SubscriberWhen the length of the dielectric medium is satisfied with constructive interference condition (L = m*(lambda/2)), the oscillating region mentioned above exists only in the lossless dielectric medium.
Is it possible to use dipolepower command, different from the case mentioned above?
Thanks for your help.
February 4, 2022 at 6:30 pmGuilin SunAnsys EmployeeThere are several related issues that need to be clarified:
sourcepower is analytical without considering the environment and material loss, eg, it is analytically calculated as if the dipole is located in a homogeneous lossless medium.
dipolepower is the actual radiated power, provided that the dipole is located in lossless, or with small dispersion, and the mesh size is not very small.
Please refer: dipolepower - Script command sourcepower - Script command
The transmission from the monitor is T_mon=recorded_power/sourcepower, and the renormalization should be T+T_mon*sourcepower/dipolepower as you did.
However, since it has strict conditions to use dipolepower, you may need to use a box monitor group to get the radiated power. The accuracy of this method depends on the box volume (as it needs spatial integration), the box size and loss of the material involved. It can underestimate the radiated power if the box is large and the loss is strong, as some power can be absorbed inside the box.
As for the result you provided:
the renormalized is smaller than 1 (the dash curve), which indicates the dipolepower may be accurate.
The grey box around the dipole is used for source injection. Inside the box the fields are not physical. So as long as your monitor does not penetrate this region, it should be ok. If you find the result is not reasonable, then we can take a close look.
Viewing 4 reply threads- The topic ‘Dose dipolepower command work in this case?’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussions- Difference between answers in version 2024 and 2017 lumerical mode solution
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- Import material .txt file with script
- Help for qINTERCONNECT
- Trapezoidal ring
- Issues with getting result from interconnent analysis script
- Topology Optimization Error
- Edge Coupler EME Example Issue
- How to measure transmission coefficients on a given plane .
Top Contributors-
1231
-
543
-
523
-
225
-
209
Top Rated Tags© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-
The Ansys Learning Forum is a public forum. You are prohibited from providing (i) information that is confidential to You, your employer, or any third party, (ii) Personal Data or individually identifiable health information, (iii) any information that is U.S. Government Classified, Controlled Unclassified Information, International Traffic in Arms Regulators (ITAR) or Export Administration Regulators (EAR) controlled or otherwise have been determined by the United States Government or by a foreign government to require protection against unauthorized disclosure for reasons of national security, or (iv) topics or information restricted by the People's Republic of China data protection and privacy laws.