-
-
February 27, 2023 at 10:41 am
-
February 27, 2023 at 2:25 pmRobForum Moderator
You mean the jet penetration is too low? Please zoom in and show the mesh.
-
February 27, 2023 at 4:26 pm
-
February 27, 2023 at 4:56 pmRobForum Moderator
Replot with node values off, and then tell me why you think the jet should penetrate the domain with that level of mesh refinement.
-
February 27, 2023 at 5:22 pmDiogo MartinhoSubscriber
So if my mesh is much finer, will the jet propagate more?
-
February 28, 2023 at 9:33 amRobForum Moderator
Not necessarily, but with a coarse mesh you'll see far more false/numerical diffusion. Most courses teach y+ for meshing to the exclusion of all else. They neglect to mention that you must also resolve the farfield and all flow features. Repost the image, and then tell me how well you think the jet is resolved.
-
Viewing 5 reply threads
- The topic ‘Difference in results – Pressure inlet seems to be wrong’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation Space
Trending discussions
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- error udf
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
- Facing trouble regarding setting up boundary conditions for SOEC Modeling
- UDF, Fluent: Access count of iterations for “Steady Statistics”
Top Contributors
-
1406
-
599
-
591
-
555
-
366
Top Rated Tags
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.