TAGGED: band-edge, pulse, transmission
-
-
August 5, 2021 at 3:23 am
asun
SubscriberHi, I’m having trouble simulating a pulse propagating a photonic crystal using FDTD Solutions. At first, i used a broad-band source for transmission calculation. Then i changed it to an ultra short pulse (~200 fs) to detect transmission, and the result turned out to be four orders of magnitude smaller than 0.02 calculated using the broad-band source.
Why the difference in transmission between two kinds sources is so huge? There’s even no nonlinear effect and absorption set in material. Is it possible other parameters i set were not proper?
August 5, 2021 at 11:05 pmGuilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeWhen you change to ultra short pulse, do you know if the spectrum changes or not? FDTD mesh depends on the smallest wavelength inside the material. For simple dispersive material, it depends on min(wavelength/real(n)). So if the starting wavelength changes, the mesh is different, and thus the result may be different. In addition, if source changes, the material fitting will be changed. You can fix the meshing and material fitting. Please refer this post: Ansys Insight: 光谱宽度会影响同波长的透过率吗?分段仿真如何得到光滑的结果 One important question: is there any specific reason you want to use ultra-short pulse? are you simulating nonlinear material? if not, except some special cases, I would recommend to use standard source pulse.Viewing 1 reply thread- The topic ‘Difference between transmission using different sources’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussionsTop Contributors-
3327
-
1042
-
1017
-
865
-
826
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-