General Mechanical

General Mechanical

Topics related to Mechanical Enterprise, Motion, Additive Print and more.

Convergence problem when going from 2023 R1 to R2

    • Simon-Olivier
      Subscriber

      Hi,
      I would like your help since I am a stuck with this problem.
      Context:
      I solve a transient and nonlinear TE simulation with standard Newton-Raphson.
      - With 2023 R1 version, the model is very stable and converges very well (symmetric global matrix)
      - With 2023 R2 version, the model no longer converges (non- symmetric global matrix)
      I noticed that:
      - With 2023 R1 version , the model generates a symmetric global matrix
      - With 2023 R2 version, the model generates a non-symmetrical global matrix, possibly brought about by the addition of new terms in elementary calculation
      My question:
      - What caused this non-symmetry in 2023 R2 version?
      Is there an option somewhere that eliminates the consideration of this non-symmetry (to generate a symmetric global matrix)?
      Thank you very much for your help.

    • Ashish Khemka
      Forum Moderator

      Hi Simon,

      You can compare the input files - ds.dat for both the analysis. Right click on solution information and you will be able to see a file named ds.dat which is the input file to the solver. Comparing them will give you an idea on what is different in the setup for both the analysis.

      Regards,

      Ashish Khemka

      • Simon-Olivier
        Subscriber

         

        Hi, 

        Thank you for the reply.

        I compare the ds file for a very simple model and the only change is my node numerotation and I don’t know why (same number of node/elements/quality statistics…).

        Also, the change in the global matrix formulation stays the same:

         

        • With 2023 R1 version, tsymmetric global matrix
        • With 2023 R2 version,non- symmetric global matrix

        But this time, since the model is very simple, I can get a solution in the 2 cases.

        Is there a reason for matrix symetric/non-simmetric?

        Thank you for your help

         

    • Ashish Khemka
      Forum Moderator

      Hi Simon,

      Thanks for sharing this. Let me check and I will let you know.

      Regards,

      Ashish Khemka

    • dlooman
      Ansys Employee

      Around that time we made the Seebeck effect strongly coupled.  This is probably the issue.  Set KEYOPT(2)=1 to go back to load vector coupling.  LNSRCH,ON is frequently helpful in these analyses.

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Convergence problem when going from 2023 R1 to R2’ is closed to new replies.