-
-
July 4, 2024 at 6:20 am
-
July 4, 2024 at 6:37 amErik KostsonAnsys Employee
Hi
It (max min variation) is because of the stress singularity at fixed location and between them 2 (at contact location) – look at stresses away from these points and say in the middlle of the 2 members.
Even better is to use beam elements (1D line elements), where this does not happen (singularity). For the right wall (0.4 mm gap) one can usse a translational joint at the end of the copper rod with a stop of x=0.4 mm.
All the best
Erik
-
July 19, 2024 at 1:41 pmErik KostsonAnsys Employee
Hope all this helped since it might be of use to others we can close the post as it has been answered.
-
Viewing 2 reply threads
- The topic ‘Comparison of theory and simulation’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation Space
Trending discussions
- Ayuda con Error: “Unable to access the source: EngineeringData”
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Error when opening saved Workbench project
- How to apply Compression-only Support?
- Geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements
- How to select the interface delamination surface of a laminate?
- Timestep range set for animation export
- Image to file in Mechanical is bugged and does not show text
- SMART crack under fatigue conditions, different crack sizes can’t growth
- Frictional No separation contact
Top Contributors
-
1281
-
591
-
544
-
524
-
366
Top Rated Tags
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.