-
-
November 1, 2021 at 2:06 am
niazulkhan
SubscriberIn the example available here at: Photothermal heating in plasmonic nanostructures – Lumerical Support, the heat profile is simulated for a diabolo antenna array on area of 85um x 85 um, though the illuminated area is only 298 um^2 (equivalent to a FWHM of 19.5 um). I would like to change the total area to 100um x 100um for example. May I ask where I should in the diabolo_arrat.fsp file?
November 1, 2021 at 10:15 pmGuilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeMaybe you can read that example again to get more simulation methodology.
FDTD is used only to simulate a single unit cell, assuming it is infinitely periodic. As for the total area, we do not simulate it, which was discussed before. It is in the post-simulation process that may need to use the extra information.
If you want, you can simulate the whole device, eg, antenna array on area of 85um x 85 um, with all the antenna diabolos present. But you may need to think it over what source is going to be used: Gaussian or plane wave? if plane wave, you will need to use TFSF.
The on line example only simulates the unit cell and through post processing to get the final result. Maybe the paper also used the same method. Please note that experiment may not be the same as simulation, due to a number of reasons.
Viewing 1 reply thread- The topic ‘Changing total area in FDTD example of photothermal heat generation’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussionsTop Contributors-
2773
-
960
-
830
-
599
-
591
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-
We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.