TAGGED: ansys-maxwell, boundary-conditions, magnetostatic
-
-
January 19, 2022 at 2:53 pm
H2020
SubscriberHello,
I am simulating the B-field distribution around wire bonds right now and have created a box with 600% padding in Z direction for my module. However, when I changed the padding and added a 300% padding in negative Z direction, my results changed drastically! Does anyone know what went wrong here?
Best,
H2020
January 24, 2022 at 6:58 amNavya Chode
Ansys Employee
As long as the region is sufficient enough to cover the whole field distribution you should get the same result for anything Region size above that region size.
But if you set the computational region such that it is not fully enclosing the whole magnetic field you will get a difference in results.
You can plot the fields and check if all the dominant field lines are enclosed in the region to figure this out.
I suggest you run a parametric starting from 2r to 20r region size .. (R basically be the 100% of the region size)
At some point, maybe at 10r, hopefully, you will not see the difference in the result after that.
*If the field results change significantly when the region size is changed, the region is not large enough.
Regards Navya
January 24, 2022 at 8:54 amH2020
SubscriberThanks Navya I didnt know about that. I ran a sweep and found out at which paddings the fields stop changing.
Best Regards!
Viewing 2 reply threads- The topic ‘Changing the boundary region paddings in Maxwell changes the results?’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussionsTop Contributors-
3387
-
1052
-
1050
-
886
-
852
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-