We’re putting the final touches on our new badges platform. Badge issuance remains temporarily paused, but all completions are being recorded and will be fulfilled once the platform is live. Thank you for your patience.
Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Change Relaxation Factors for Pseudo-Transient in Text Interface

    • nobrien
      Subscriber

      Hello!

      I'm using Fluent 2021R2, and I am trying to change the under-relaxation factors for the different equations with the Pseudo-Transient method. Through the graphical interface, I can change momentum, pressure, k, omega, body forces, density, and Turbulent viscosity. While that could work, I'd like to control these factors from a text-command so I can run them on an HPC without setting up the case in a GUI.

      The text command for changing the pseudo-transient relaxation factors is in /solve/set/pseudo-relaxation-factor, but this text command does not let me change the factors for momentum or pressure equations. Is there a text command that I am missing? I couldn't find it in the text command guide or just by snooping around the text-command menus. Would I instead need to use a scheme command to set it manually?

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      /solve/set/under-relaxation perhaps? 

    • nobrien
      Subscriber

      Hmm I'm not seeing that option. Here is what I'm seeing: 

      Maybe I can look in another menu for the under-relaxation option, but it looks like "relaxation method", "high-order-term-relaxation", and "pseudo-relaxation" all lack the option to change the pressure-momentum relaxation factors...

      This is the page showing the factors in the GUI, but I would prefer to change the relaxation factors through a text command.

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      I'd missed that you were using an older build, it's there in 24R2. Some of the options have changed so it's possible the UR factors weren't fully exposed for pseudo-transient at 21Rx. 

    • nobrien
      Subscriber

      Ah, no worries. I figured that may have been the case.

      Thanks, Rob!

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.