We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
General Mechanical

General Mechanical

Topics related to Mechanical Enterprise, Motion, Additive Print and more.

Applying remote point with deformable behavior to an edge in Workbench

    • lhildebrand
      Subscriber

      Hi all.  I'm using the Static Structural module of ANSYS workbench. I have a structure modeled with beams.

      I have a set of loads that acts at the CG of the structure, and I would like to apply that set of loads to one of the beams as a remote force and a remote moment. I created a remote point scoped to that beam using deformable behavior in order to do this. Whenever I try to run the simulation, though, I get the following error:

      "One or more loads is using a deformable behavior but is applied to a collinear edge.  This is invalid, thus the behavior has been changed to Rigid.  Check the Solver Output on the Solution Information object to identify the offending load."

       

      I know that the issue is the remote point, but I don't know why it's an issue to have a load using deformable behavior on an edge. My questions are as follows:

      -Why is this happening? 

      -Is there some way of scoping a remote point to an edge using deformable behavior without getting this warning?

      -When I scope a remote point to vertices, I don't have the option to set the behavior. In that situation, is the behavior automatically rigid or deformable?

      -Any suggestions on how to model this? Do I need to use something other than beams?

    • Erik Kostson
      Ansys Employee

       

       

       

       

       

       

      Hi

      Remote force and moment (deform.) works fine on remote points scoped to beam edges or beam nodes directly (2024 R2).

      but I would suggest as all remote points are approximations of the structures and are thus not suitable often.

      So to be correct here I would represent the structure at the CG and the structures connecting it to the beam (s).


      All the best

      Erik

       

       

       

       

       

       

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.